Antić Vukasin, Vuković Zarko
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2006 Oct;134 Suppl 2:162-6. doi: 10.2298/sarh06s2162a.
Disputes, divisions and even conflicts, so frequent in Serbia, have not bypassed physicians-members of the Serbian Medical Society; ones of the most important occurred at the crossroad of the 19th and 20th centuries related to foundation of the School of Medicine in Belgrade. The most prominent and persistent advocate of foundation of the School of Medicine was Dr. Milan Jovanović Batut. In 1899, he presented the paper "The Medical School of the Serbian University". Batut's effort was worth serious attention but did not produce fruit. On the contrary, Dr. Mihailo Petrović criticized Batut by opening the discussion "Is the Medical School in Serbia the most acute sanitary necessity or not?" in the Serbian Archives, in 1900. However, such an attitude led to intervention of Dr. Doka Nikolić, who defended Batut's views. He published his article in Janko Veselinović's magazine "The Star". Since then up to 1904, all discussions about Medical School had stopped. It was not even mentioned during the First Congress of Serbian Physicians and Scientists. Nevertheless, at the very end of the gathering, a professor from Prague, Dr. Jaromil Hvala claimed that "the First Serbian Congress had prepared the material for the future Medical School", thus sending a message to the attendants of what importance for Serbia its foundation would have been. But the President of both the Congress and the Serbian Medical Society, as well as the editor of the Serbian Archives, Dr. Jovan Danić announced that "the First Congress of Serbian Physicians and Scientists had finished its work". It was evident that Danić belonged to those medical circles which jealously guarded special privileges of doctors and other eminent persons who had very serious doctrinal disagreements on the foundation of the Medical School. All that seemed to have grown into clash, which finally resulted in the fact that Serbia got Higher Medical School within the University of Belgrade with a great delay, only after the First World War.
争端、分歧乃至冲突，在塞尔维亚屡见不鲜，塞尔维亚医学协会的医生们也未能幸免；其中最重要的一次发生在19世纪与20世纪之交，与贝尔格莱德医学院的创立有关。医学院创立最杰出、最执着的倡导者是米兰·约万诺维奇·巴图特博士。1899年，他发表了论文《塞尔维亚大学医学院》。巴图特的努力值得认真关注，但并未取得成果。相反，米哈伊洛·彼得罗维奇博士在1900年的《塞尔维亚档案》中开启了“塞尔维亚医学院是否是最紧迫的卫生需求？”的讨论，对巴图特进行了批评。然而，这种态度引发了多卡·尼科利奇博士的干预，他为巴图特的观点辩护。他在扬科·韦塞利诺维奇的杂志《星辰》上发表了文章。从那时起到1904年，关于医学院的所有讨论都停止了。在塞尔维亚医师和科学家第一次代表大会上甚至都未被提及。然而，在会议即将结束时，来自布拉格的教授雅罗米尔·赫瓦拉博士声称“塞尔维亚第一次代表大会为未来的医学院准备了材料”，从而向与会者传达了其创立对塞尔维亚的重要性。但代表大会和塞尔维亚医学协会的主席，以及《塞尔维亚档案》的编辑约万·达尼奇博士宣布“塞尔维亚医师和科学家第一次代表大会已完成其工作”。很明显，达尼奇属于那些嫉妒地捍卫医生和其他知名人士特权的医学圈子，他们在医学院的创立问题上存在严重的教义分歧。所有这些似乎都演变成了冲突，最终导致塞尔维亚在第一次世界大战后才迟迟在贝尔格莱德大学内设立了高等医学院。
