Rodríguez-Martos Alicia
Adicciones. 2007;19(4):325-31.
Wine belongs to the Mediterranean culture. Drinking alcohol is part of our social life, and its negative consequences have often been minimised, blame being apportioned rather to the individual, who doesn't know how to drink, than to the agent causing the harm. In recent years, road accidents and binge-drinking among young people have put alcohol on the political agenda. Adolescents and young adults have increased their consumption, and a pattern of binge-drinking has developed based on the open-air 'fiesta' nightlife, where groups of young people drink large bottles in the streets and squares (botellón). Educational campaigns and material have been mounted and produced, but two consecutive draft laws on measures for the prevention of alcohol-related harm have failed to be approved, coming up on both occasions against the same vested interests. This editorial reviews the ambivalence of society towards regulations on alcohol and the current state of the art. The first draft law (2002) was about preventing alcohol problems in the general population; the second (2006) was limited to the question of prevention among minors. Nobody could oppose it, not even the industry. However, an interested bias put the accent on wine--which allegedly should be considered not as alcohol but rather as food, and consequently removed from the law--so that discussion of the draft law became a 'wine war', with predictable consequences. Once again, a draft law on alcohol was shelved sine die and tossed into a corner to gather dust. WithIn this pessimistic scene, though, there are still some positive signs. No economic or political motives should constitute an obstacle to the protection of minors, at the very least.
葡萄酒属于地中海文化。饮酒是我们社会生活的一部分,其负面后果常常被淡化,责任更多地归咎于个人,认为是个人不会喝酒,而非造成危害的酒精本身。近年来,道路交通事故以及年轻人的酗酒行为已将酒精问题提上了政治议程。青少年和年轻人的饮酒量有所增加,基于露天“节日”夜生活形成了一种酗酒模式,即一群年轻人在街上和广场上大口喝大瓶装酒(西班牙式聚会狂饮)。已经开展并制作了教育活动和宣传材料,但两项关于预防酒精相关危害措施的法律草案均未获得通过,每次都遇到了同样的既得利益阻碍。这篇社论审视了社会对酒精管制的矛盾态度以及当前的状况。第一部法律草案(2002年)旨在预防普通人群中的酒精问题;第二部(2006年)则仅限于未成年人预防问题。这本该无人反对,就连酒业也不例外。然而,一种利益相关的偏见将重点放在了葡萄酒上——据说葡萄酒不应被视为酒精,而应被视为食物,因此应从法律中剔除——这样一来,法律草案的讨论就变成了一场“葡萄酒之战”,结果可想而知。关于酒精的法律草案再次被无限期搁置,被扔到角落里积满灰尘。不过,在这种悲观的情形下,仍有一些积极的迹象。至少,经济或政治动机不应成为保护未成年人的障碍。