• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辩论:一种培养沟通能力和批判性思维能力的教学策略。

Debate: a teaching-learning strategy for developing competence in communication and critical thinking.

作者信息

Darby Michele

机构信息

Gene W. Hirschfeld School of Dental Hygiene, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va., USA.

出版信息

J Dent Hyg. 2007 Fall;81(4):78. Epub 2007 Oct 1.

PMID:18173892
Abstract

The literature highlights key benefits from debate as a teaching-learning strategy for developing critical thinking and analytical skills while fostering teamwork and communication. Authors report that this method of teaching-learning has been implemented successfully in nursing and occupational therapy programs and would benefit other academic programs in the health sciences, particularly in courses that cover controversial issues. Although there are disadvantages to using the debate as a teaching-learning strategy, the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages. In conclusion, debating is an effective pedagogical strategy because of the level of responsibility for learning and active involvement required by all student debaters. Moreover, it provides an experience by which students can develop competencies in researching current issues, preparing logical arguments, actively listening to various perspectives, differentiating between subjective and evidence-based information, asking cogent questions, integrating relevant information, and formulating their own opinions based on evidence. After the debate is over, students also report that the experience is FUN!

摘要

文献强调了辩论作为一种教学策略的关键益处,它有助于培养批判性思维和分析能力,同时促进团队合作与沟通。作者报告称,这种教学方法已在护理和职业治疗项目中成功实施,对健康科学领域的其他学术项目也有益处,尤其是在涉及有争议问题的课程中。尽管将辩论用作教学策略存在一些缺点,但益处远大于缺点。总之,辩论是一种有效的教学策略,因为它要求所有参与辩论的学生都承担学习责任并积极参与。此外,它为学生提供了一种体验,使他们能够在研究当前问题、准备逻辑论证、积极倾听各种观点、区分主观信息和基于证据的信息、提出有说服力的问题、整合相关信息以及基于证据形成自己的观点等方面培养能力。辩论结束后,学生们也表示这种体验很有趣!

相似文献

1
Debate: a teaching-learning strategy for developing competence in communication and critical thinking.辩论:一种培养沟通能力和批判性思维能力的教学策略。
J Dent Hyg. 2007 Fall;81(4):78. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
2
Exploration of critical thinking in dental hygiene education.口腔卫生教育中的批判性思维探索。
J Dent Hyg. 2014 Dec;88(6):394-402.
3
The use of structured debate as a teaching strategy among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.结构化辩论在本科护理专业学生中作为一种教学策略的应用:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104766. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104766. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Using guided debates to teach current issues.使用引导式辩论来教授当前问题。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Jun;53(6):352-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140512-04. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Debate: a teaching strategy to improve verbal communication and critical-thinking skills.辩论:一种提高语言沟通和批判性思维能力的教学策略。
Nurse Educ. 1996 Jul-Aug;21(4):37-40. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199607000-00015.
6
Utilizing debates as an instructional tool for dental students.将辩论作为牙科学生的教学工具。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Mar;72(3):282-7.
7
An online debate series for first-year pharmacy students.面向药学专业大一学生的线上辩论系列活动。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Feb 15;71(1):12. doi: 10.5688/aj710112.
8
The influence of technology on reflective learning in dental hygiene education.技术对口腔卫生教育中反思性学习的影响。
J Dent Educ. 2010 Jun;74(6):644-53.
9
Collaborative learning in pre-clinical dental hygiene education.临床前口腔卫生保健教育中的合作学习
J Dent Hyg. 2013 Apr;87(2):64-72.
10
Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education - does it work?对卫生专业教育中辩论运用情况的系统评价——它有效吗?
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Aug 15;36(4):Doc37. doi: 10.3205/zma001245. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Debating: effective and satisfactory learning method in dentistry.辩论:牙科学中有效的、令人满意的学习方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05286-5.
2
Critical Psychiatry Debates; A Neglected Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education.批判性精神病学辩论:本科医学教育中被忽视的工具。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Sep 20;10:55. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000055.2. eCollection 2021.
3
To debate or not to debate? Examining the contribution of debating when studying medical ethics in small groups.是否应该进行辩论?探讨在小组学习医学伦理学中辩论的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 20;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03124-0.
4
Competitive Debate: A Successful Inter-team Gamification Experience in the Human Resources Subject.竞技辩论:人力资源学科中一次成功的团队间游戏化体验
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 10;12:708677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708677. eCollection 2021.
5
Use of Debate as a Pedagogical Tool in Psychiatry Residency Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study.辩论作为精神病学住院医师教学中的一种教学工具的应用:一项横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Aug 10;12:871-877. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S320614. eCollection 2021.
6
Effect of Interprofessional Clinical Debates on Attitudes of Interprofessional Teams.跨专业临床辩论对跨专业团队态度的影响。
PRiMER. 2021 Apr 7;5:14. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2021.154149. eCollection 2021.
7
Not Another Boring Resident Didactic Conference.不要再开无聊的住院医师教学会议了。
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Jul 9;4(Suppl 1):S113-S121. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10367. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education - does it work?对卫生专业教育中辩论运用情况的系统评价——它有效吗?
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Aug 15;36(4):Doc37. doi: 10.3205/zma001245. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Focused Debate on the Development of Ethical Reasoning Skills in Pharmacy Technician Students.评估集中辩论在培养药学技术人员学生伦理推理技能方面的效果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6280. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6280.
10
Using debate to teach pharmacy students about ethical issues.运用辩论向药学专业学生传授伦理问题。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Apr 17;78(3):57. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78357.