Colhoun Helen M
The Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007 Oct;9(4):286-95. doi: 10.1007/s11883-007-0035-2.
There is considerable disparity between the major clinical guidelines on lipid targets in diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Over the past few years, several trials have reported results that contribute to the evidence base for such lipid targets. The Treat to New Targets study data provide support for the efficacy and safety of using high-dose statin therapy for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to at least 2 mmol/L in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study and the Heart Protection Study provide support for the efficacy and safety of lowering LDL-C to at least 2 mmol/L with lower doses of statins. Once these LDL-C targets have been reached, it is unknown whether targeting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides is more efficacious than further lowering of LDL-C. The optimal treatment strategy, therefore, is unclear. Trials are underway to resolve this question. Patients with metabolic syndrome derive similar relative reduction in CVD from statin therapy as those without, and the appropriate treatment and targets depend on the estimated CVD risk. Prediction of CVD risk with currently available risk scores is imperfect but there is little evidence that including metabolic syndrome improves risk prediction beyond Framingham Risk Score mainly because the latter already includes blood pressure and HDL-C.
糖尿病和代谢综合征血脂目标的主要临床指南之间存在相当大的差异。在过去几年中,多项试验报告了有助于此类血脂目标证据基础的结果。“强化降脂治疗新目标”(Treat to New Targets)研究数据为在糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病(CVD)的患者中使用大剂量他汀类药物治疗将低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)降至至少2 mmol/L的有效性和安全性提供了支持。“阿托伐他汀糖尿病协作研究”(Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study)和“心脏保护研究”(Heart Protection Study)为使用较低剂量他汀类药物将LDL-C降至至少2 mmol/L的有效性和安全性提供了支持。一旦达到这些LDL-C目标,针对高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和甘油三酯是否比进一步降低LDL-C更有效尚不清楚。因此,最佳治疗策略尚不明确。正在进行试验以解决这个问题。代谢综合征患者接受他汀类药物治疗后CVD的相对降低幅度与无代谢综合征患者相似,适当的治疗方法和目标取决于估计的CVD风险。使用目前可用的风险评分预测CVD风险并不完美,但几乎没有证据表明纳入代谢综合征能比弗明汉姆风险评分(Framingham Risk Score)更好地改善风险预测,主要是因为后者已经包括了血压和HDL-C。