• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索残疾与康复的个人现实:一种增强康复过程能力的工具。

Exploring the personal reality of disability and recovery: a tool for empowering the rehabilitation process.

作者信息

Kurz Ashley E, Saint-Louis Nicole, Burke Janice P, Stineman Margaret G

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):90-105. doi: 10.1177/1049732307309006.

DOI:10.1177/1049732307309006
PMID:18174538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2879973/
Abstract

People experiencing disability and chronic disease often feel powerless, relinquishing medical control to "more knowledgeable" professionals. This article presents qualitative and quantitative results from three individual patients experiencing an emerging procedure called Recovery Preference Exploration (RPE). To inspire greater patient involvement, self-direction, and individual choice, we instructed participants to create an imagined recovery path, exposing recovery preferences while learning about clinical rehabilitation concepts. Results uncovered important values and feelings about disability, providing a richer context for patient evaluation and treatment goal modification. Applying mixed methods, RPE is presented as an explanatory process for quantifying recovery preferences in a way that stimulates rich narrative of how people see different types of disabilities. RPE shows promise for increasing depth of discussions among patients, family, and clinicians. RPE may promote greater quality of life through patient empowerment by directed learning, increased communication, and enhanced self-knowledge.

摘要

患有残疾和慢性病的人常常感到无力,将医疗控制权交给“更有知识”的专业人员。本文展示了三位经历一种名为恢复偏好探索(RPE)的新兴程序的个体患者的定性和定量结果。为了激发患者更大程度的参与、自我指导和个人选择,我们指导参与者创建一条想象中的康复路径,在了解临床康复概念的同时揭示恢复偏好。结果揭示了关于残疾的重要价值观和感受,为患者评估和治疗目标调整提供了更丰富的背景。应用混合方法,RPE被呈现为一种解释过程,用于以一种激发人们对不同类型残疾看法的丰富叙述的方式量化恢复偏好。RPE有望加深患者、家庭和临床医生之间的讨论深度。RPE可能通过定向学习、增加沟通和增强自我认知来赋予患者权力,从而提高生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/2986d922722f/nihms-162277-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/5f788f9bbeea/nihms-162277-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/79d6fe6501d4/nihms-162277-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/9ee3d82bee1d/nihms-162277-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/db37dbff29d6/nihms-162277-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/52b97d96dd83/nihms-162277-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/514f04fcc288/nihms-162277-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/2986d922722f/nihms-162277-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/5f788f9bbeea/nihms-162277-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/79d6fe6501d4/nihms-162277-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/9ee3d82bee1d/nihms-162277-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/db37dbff29d6/nihms-162277-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/52b97d96dd83/nihms-162277-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/514f04fcc288/nihms-162277-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a9/2879973/2986d922722f/nihms-162277-f0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the personal reality of disability and recovery: a tool for empowering the rehabilitation process.探索残疾与康复的个人现实:一种增强康复过程能力的工具。
Qual Health Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):90-105. doi: 10.1177/1049732307309006.
2
Recovery preference exploration: analysis of patient feedback after imagined scenarios.康复偏好探索:对想象情景后患者反馈的分析
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;86(4):272-81. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3180383acb.
3
The patient's view of recovery: an emerging tool for empowerment through self-knowledge.患者对康复的看法:一种通过自我认知实现赋权的新兴工具。
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(9):679-88. doi: 10.1080/09638280701456112.
4
Recovery from disablement: what functional abilities do rehabilitation professionals value the most?残疾康复:康复专业人员最看重哪些功能能力?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.060. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
5
Disability meanings according to patients and clinicians: imagined recovery choice pathways.患者和临床医生对残疾的理解:想象中的康复选择途径。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):389-98. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9441-y. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
6
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
7
Through the clinician's lens: objective and subjective views of disability.从临床医生的视角看:对残疾的客观与主观观点
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/1049732308327853. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
8
A stakeholder-involved adaptation of pathways and resources for engagement and participation (PREP) material with young adults with complex disability in Australia: an implementation feasibility study.澳大利亚针对患有复杂残疾的年轻人,开展的一项利益相关者参与的、对参与和融入途径及资源(PREP)材料进行调整的实施可行性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 May;47(10):2586-2598. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2397083. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
9
Elements contributing to meaningful participation for children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review.促进残疾儿童和青年有意义参与的因素:一项范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Aug;39(17):1771-1784. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1207716. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
Unpacking how trust, communication and flow interact to sustain quality relationships between disabled people, family and support workers: a realist qualitative study.剖析信任、沟通与流畅性如何相互作用以维系残疾人、家庭与支持工作者之间的优质关系:一项实在论质性研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(8):2054-2064. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2390049. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Gut Feelings: Transformations in Coping With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Young Adults.理解肠道感受:年轻人应对炎症性肠病的应对方式转变。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Aug;31(10):1918-1936. doi: 10.1177/10497323211011442. Epub 2021 May 13.
2
The biopsycho-ecological paradigm: a foundational theory for medicine.生物心理-生态范式:医学的基础理论。
PM R. 2010 Nov;2(11):1035-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.013.
3
Disability meanings according to patients and clinicians: imagined recovery choice pathways.患者和临床医生对残疾的理解:想象中的康复选择途径。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):389-98. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9441-y. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
4
Through the clinician's lens: objective and subjective views of disability.从临床医生的视角看:对残疾的客观与主观观点
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/1049732308327853. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
5
Recovery from disablement: what functional abilities do rehabilitation professionals value the most?残疾康复:康复专业人员最看重哪些功能能力?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.060. Epub 2008 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition: [Excerpt].《疾病叙事:苦难、治愈与人类状况》:[节选]
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1406. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001864.
2
Recovery preference exploration: analysis of patient feedback after imagined scenarios.康复偏好探索:对想象情景后患者反馈的分析
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;86(4):272-81. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3180383acb.
3
A systems approach to patient-centered care.一种以患者为中心的系统护理方法。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2848-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2848.
4
Is PM&R teetering on the precipice of a dark age?物理医学与康复医学是否正徘徊在黑暗时代的边缘?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Mar;87(3):315-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.009.
5
Cross-cultural differences in preference for recovery of mobility among spinal cord injury rehabilitation professionals.
Spinal Cord. 2006 Sep;44(9):567-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101876. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
6
Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions.积极心理学进展:干预措施的实证验证
Am Psychol. 2005 Jul-Aug;60(5):410-21. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.
7
Patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction in Parkinson's disease: effect on therapy decisions and quality of life.帕金森病患者感知到的参与度和满意度:对治疗决策及生活质量的影响。
Mov Disord. 2005 May;20(5):616-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.20393.
8
Designing a mixed methods study in primary care.设计一项初级保健中的混合方法研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;2(1):7-12. doi: 10.1370/afm.104.
9
Empowerment of patients with end-stage renal disease--a randomized controlled trial.终末期肾病患者赋权——一项随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Jan;41(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00095-6.
10
A model of health environmental integration.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001 Summer;8(2):34-45. doi: 10.1310/0L5G-NQHY-GH4K-HV58.