Aguiar Andréa, Baillargeon Renée
University of Waterloo, Ontario, Waterloo, Canada.
Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):277-316. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00044-1.
In the present research, 6.5-month-old infants perseverated in a violation-of-expectation task designed to examine their reasoning about width information in containment events. After watching a familiarization event in which a ball was lowered into a wide container, the infants failed to detect the violation in a test event in which the same ball was lowered into a container only half as wide as the ball (narrow-container test event). This negative result (which was replicated in another experiment) was interpreted in terms of a recent problem-solving account of infants' perseverative errors in various means-end tasks (Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (2000). Perseveration and problem solving in infancy. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 27, pp. 135-180). San Diego, CA: Academic Press). It was assumed that the infants in the present experiments (1) did not attend to the relative widths of the ball and container in their initial analysis of the narrow-container test event, (2) categorized the event as similar to the familiarization event shown on the preceding trials, and (3) retrieved the expectation they had formed for that event ("the ball will fit into the container"), resulting in a perseverative error. This interpretation was supported by additional experiments in which different modifications were introduced that led to non-perseverative responding, indicating that 6.5-month-old infants could detect the violation in the narrow-container test event. The present findings are important for several reasons. First, they provide the first demonstration of perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task. Second, they make clear the breadth and usefulness of the problem-solving account mentioned above. Finally, they add to the evidence for some degree of continuity between infants' and adults' problem-solving abilities.
在本研究中,6.5个月大的婴儿在一项违反预期任务中表现出了持续性,该任务旨在考察他们对包含事件中宽度信息的推理。在观看了一个球被放入一个宽容器的熟悉事件后,婴儿们未能在测试事件中察觉到违反预期的情况,在该测试事件中,同一个球被放入一个宽度仅为球一半的容器中(窄容器测试事件)。这一负面结果(在另一项实验中得到了重复)是根据最近对婴儿在各种手段-目的任务中持续性错误的问题解决解释来解读的(阿吉亚尔,A.,& 贝拉吉昂,R.(2000)。婴儿期的持续性和问题解决。载于H. W. 里斯(编),《儿童发展与行为进展》(第27卷,第135 - 180页)。加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥:学术出版社)。假设本实验中的婴儿(1)在对窄容器测试事件的初始分析中没有注意到球和容器的相对宽度,(2)将该事件归类为与之前试验中展示的熟悉事件相似,并且(3)检索了他们对该事件形成的预期(“球会放进容器里”),从而导致了持续性错误。这一解释得到了其他实验的支持,在这些实验中引入了不同的修改,导致了非持续性反应,表明6.5个月大的婴儿能够在窄容器测试事件中察觉到违反预期的情况。本研究结果之所以重要有几个原因。首先,它们首次证明了在违反预期任务中的持续性反应。其次,它们明确了上述问题解决解释的广度和实用性。最后,它们增加了关于婴儿和成人问题解决能力之间某种程度连续性的证据。