Ambrosch Andreas, Lobmann Ralf, Pott Andreas, Preissler Jŭrgen
Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, St Joseph Hospital, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany.
Int Wound J. 2008 Mar;5(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00347.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
Bacterial pathogenicity, microbial load and diversity are decisive for outcome and therapy of non healing ulcers. However, until now, no routine laboratory parameter is available to assess the inflammatory level caused by chronic wound infections. We thus investigated the usefulness of levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) in wound fluids for assessing ulcer inflammation in the presence or absence of microbial triggers. In addition, the predictive values of local cytokine analyses were compared with those of C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) because serological markers are normally used to underline the suspicion of wound infections. The present data from chronic arterial and venous ulcers (n = 45) clearly show that mixed bacterial infections increased IL-6 and TNFalpha concentrations in wound fluids when compared with ulcers with a monomicrobial infection (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). IL-6 was also significantly elevated when a high bacterial load [versus <10(5) colony-forming units (cfu)/ml: P = 0.04] or an infection with Pseudomonas was observed (versus isolation of non Pseudomonas strains: P = 0.05). Although distinct proinflammatory triggers may interfere with regard to cytokine levels, sensitivity and specificity were significant in predicting bacterial risk factors, particularly for IL-6 at a designated cut-off of 125 pg/ml (sensitivity and specificity for predicting a mixed infection: 70% and 64%, for predicting a bacterial load of >10(5) cfu/ml: 62% and 57% and for predicting an infection with Pseudomonas: 90% and 57%). In contrast to local cytokine levels, the serological markers CRP and LBP were not associated with the presence of any of the investigated bacterial triggers. Focusing on the aim of the study, IL-6 analysed in wound washouts seems to be a useful diagnostic marker for a sensitive and specific assessment of ulcers inflammation with regard to bacterial triggers.
细菌致病性、微生物负荷及多样性对难愈合溃疡的预后和治疗起决定性作用。然而,目前尚无常规实验室参数可用于评估慢性伤口感染所引起的炎症水平。因此,我们研究了伤口液中白细胞介素(IL)-6和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)水平在有无微生物触发因素情况下评估溃疡炎症的效用。此外,将局部细胞因子分析的预测价值与C反应蛋白(CRP)和脂多糖结合蛋白(LBP)的预测价值进行比较,因为血清学标志物通常用于支持伤口感染的怀疑。来自慢性动脉和静脉溃疡(n = 45)的当前数据清楚地表明,与单一微生物感染的溃疡相比,混合细菌感染会增加伤口液中IL-6和TNFα的浓度(分别为P < 0.01和P < 0.05)。当观察到高细菌负荷[与<10(5)菌落形成单位(cfu)/毫升相比:P = 0.04]或感染铜绿假单胞菌时(与分离出非铜绿假单胞菌菌株相比:P = 0.05),IL-6也显著升高。尽管不同的促炎触发因素可能在细胞因子水平方面存在干扰,但在预测细菌危险因素方面,敏感性和特异性显著,特别是对于指定临界值为125 pg/ml的IL-6(预测混合感染的敏感性和特异性:70%和64%,预测细菌负荷>10(5) cfu/ml的敏感性和特异性:62%和57%,预测铜绿假单胞菌感染的敏感性和特异性:90%和57%)。与局部细胞因子水平相反,血清学标志物CRP和LBP与任何所研究的细菌触发因素均无关联。着眼于研究目的,伤口冲洗液中分析的IL-6似乎是一种有用的诊断标志物,可用于敏感且特异评估与细菌触发因素相关的溃疡炎症。