Rodriguez Rene Fernando, Castillo Javier M, Castillo María P, Montoya Olga, Daza Paola, Rodríguez Mario F, Restrepo José M, León Miguel E, Angel Ana M
Universidad Libre de Cali, Cali, Valle, Colombia.
Clin J Pain. 2008 Jan;24(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318156ca4d.
The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of opioids hydrocodone and tramadol in the relief of cancer pain.
One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic cancer pain participated in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Sixty-two patients received hydrocodone and 56 patients received tramadol.
Hydrocodone/acetaminophen was effective in relieving pain in 56.5% of the patients at the starting dose of 25 mg/2500 mg/d. An additional 14.5% of the patients responded to a double dose, and the remaining 29% of patients did not experience any pain relief from hydrocodone administration. One dose of tramadol at 200 mg/d produced pain relief in 62% of the patients and alleviated pain in another 11% of patients at a dose of 400 mg/d, and remaining 27% of patients did not experience pain relief from tramadol. No significant statistical difference in the analgesic efficacy of tramadol clorhydrate and hydrocodone/acetaminophen was found. The groups differed significantly in the incidence of side effects like nausea (P=0.03; relative risk (RR), 1.69; confidence interval (IC) 95%, 1.03-2.77), vomiting (P=0.02; RR, 2.21; IC 95%, 1.14-4.32), dizziness (P=0.03; RR, 2.12; IC 95%, 1.17-3.86), loss of appetite (P=0.02; RR, 3.27; IC 95%, 1.12-9.55) and weakness (P=0.019; RR, 7.75; IC 95%, 0.98-61.05).
There was no superior analgesic efficacy with the administration of hydrocodone/acetaminophen when compared to patients receiving tramadol in the relief of cancer pain. Tramadol produced more mild side effects than hydrocodone.
本研究旨在比较氢可酮和曲马多这两种阿片类药物在缓解癌痛方面的镇痛效果和耐受性。
118例慢性癌痛患者参与了一项双盲随机对照试验。62例患者接受氢可酮治疗,56例患者接受曲马多治疗。
在起始剂量为25mg/2500mg/d时,氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚使56.5%的患者疼痛得到缓解。另外14.5%的患者对双倍剂量有反应,其余29%的患者使用氢可酮治疗后未出现任何疼痛缓解。曲马多200mg/d单剂量使62%的患者疼痛得到缓解,400mg/d剂量使另外11%的患者疼痛得到缓解,其余27%的患者使用曲马多后未出现疼痛缓解。未发现盐酸曲马多和氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛效果有显著统计学差异。两组在恶心(P=0.03;相对危险度(RR),1.69;95%置信区间(IC),1.03 - 2.77)、呕吐(P=0.02;RR,2.21;IC 95%,1.14 - 4.32)、头晕(P=0.03;RR,2.12;IC 95%,1.17 - 3.86)、食欲不振(P=0.02;RR,3.27;IC 95%,1.12 - 9.55)和虚弱(P=0.019;RR,7.75;IC 95%,0.98 - 61.05)等副作用的发生率上有显著差异。
在缓解癌痛方面,与接受曲马多治疗的患者相比,使用氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚并未显示出更优的镇痛效果。曲马多产生的轻微副作用比氢可酮少。