Amornyotin Somchai, Chalayonnavin Wiyada, Kongphlay Siriporn
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Nov;90(11):2352-8.
Despite increased use of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy, few data exist regarding patient recovery patterns and home-readiness.
The authors prospectively identified the pattern of home-readiness, the persistent symptoms after procedure and the factors that delay discharge after home-readiness criteria are satisfied.
Three hundred and sixty nine patients were scored by the investigator using the Modified Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) every 30 min, commencing 30 min after procedure, until the PADSS score was > or =9. The same investigator telephoned each patient 24 hr after discharge to administer a standardized questionnaire so that postoperative symptoms could be identified.
The number of patients who satisfied the PADSS home-readiness criteria was 81.6%, 97.9%, and 100% at 30, 60, and 90 min, respectively. All patients were promptly discharged before two hours. After home-readiness criteria were satisfied, 36% of patients had delayed discharge because of the unavailability of immediate escorts or other non-medical reasons. No patient had persistent symptoms and all patients could achieve a PADSS score > or =9 three hours after anesthesia. The patients undergoing shorter endoscopic procedures, such as EGD or dilated esophagus were discharged faster than patients undergoing colonoscopy or duodenal stent. The 24 hr postoperative symptoms were mainly sore throat, pain, weakness, and abdominal distension. There was no incidence of unanticipated admission.
Periodic objective evaluation of home-readiness revealed that the majority of patients would achieve a satisfactory score on or before 1 hr after procedure. The time to home-readiness by objective evaluation correlated with the type of procedure. Most delays after satisfactory home-readiness scores were reached, were due to non-medical reasons.
尽管门诊胃肠内镜检查的使用有所增加,但关于患者恢复模式和出院准备情况的数据却很少。
作者前瞻性地确定了出院准备模式、术后持续症状以及满足出院准备标准后延迟出院的因素。
研究人员使用改良的麻醉后出院评分系统(PADSS)对369例患者每隔30分钟进行评分,从术后30分钟开始,直至PADSS评分≥9分。同一名研究人员在患者出院后24小时致电每位患者,发放一份标准化问卷,以便确定术后症状。
分别在30、60和90分钟时,满足PADSS出院准备标准的患者比例为81.6%、97.9%和100%。所有患者均在两小时内迅速出院。在满足出院准备标准后,36%的患者因没有即时护送人员或其他非医疗原因而延迟出院。没有患者有持续症状,所有患者在麻醉后三小时均可达到PADSS评分≥9分。接受较短内镜检查(如食管胃镜检查或食管扩张)的患者比接受结肠镜检查或十二指肠支架置入术的患者出院更快。术后24小时的症状主要是喉咙痛、疼痛、虚弱和腹胀。没有意外入院的情况发生。
对出院准备情况进行定期客观评估显示,大多数患者在术后1小时或1小时之前可获得满意评分。通过客观评估达到出院准备的时间与手术类型相关。在达到满意的出院准备评分后,大多数延迟是由于非医疗原因。