Hetzel Manuel W, Alba Sandra, Fankhauser Mariette, Mayumana Iddy, Lengeler Christian, Obrist Brigit, Nathan Rose, Makemba Ahmed M, Mshana Christopher, Schulze Alexander, Mshinda Hassan
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Swiss Tropical Institute, PO Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Malar J. 2008 Jan 9;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-7.
The Kilombero Valley is a highly malaria-endemic agricultural area in south-eastern Tanzania. Seasonal flooding of the valley is favourable to malaria transmission. During the farming season, many households move to distant field sites (shamba in Swahili) in the fertile river floodplain for the cultivation of rice. In the shamba, people live for several months in temporary shelters, far from the nearest health services. This study assessed the impact of seasonal movements to remote fields on malaria risk and treatment-seeking behaviour.
A longitudinal study followed approximately 100 randomly selected farming households over six months. Every household was visited monthly and whereabouts of household members, activities in the fields, fever cases and treatment seeking for recent fever episodes were recorded.
Fever incidence rates were lower in the shamba compared to the villages and moving to the shamba did not increase the risk of having a fever episode. Children aged 1-4 years, who usually spend a considerable amount of time in the shamba with their caretakers, were more likely to have a fever than adults (odds ratio = 4.47, 95% confidence interval 2.35-8.51). Protection with mosquito nets in the fields was extremely good (98% usage) but home-stocking of antimalarials was uncommon. Despite the long distances to health services, 55.8% (37.9-72.8) of the fever episodes were treated at a health facility, while home-management was less common (37%, 17.4-50.5).
Living in the shamba does not appear to result in a higher fever-risk. Mosquito nets usage and treatment of fever in health facilities reflect awareness of malaria. Inability to obtain drugs in the fields may contribute to less irrational use of drugs but may pose an additional burden on poor farming households. A comprehensive approach is needed to improve access to treatment while at the same time assuring rational use of medicines and protecting fragile livelihoods.
基洛梅罗河谷是坦桑尼亚东南部疟疾高度流行的农业区。该河谷季节性洪水有利于疟疾传播。在耕种季节,许多家庭会搬到肥沃的河漫滩上偏远的农田地点(斯瓦希里语称“shamba”)种植水稻。在农田里,人们要在临时住所生活数月,距离最近的医疗服务机构很远。本研究评估了季节性前往偏远农田对疟疾风险及就医行为的影响。
一项纵向研究对约100户随机选取的农户进行了为期六个月的跟踪。每月走访每户,记录家庭成员的行踪、在农田的活动、发热病例以及近期发热发作后的就医情况。
与村庄相比,农田里的发热发病率较低,搬到农田并未增加发热发作的风险。1至4岁的儿童通常与照料者在农田里度过相当长的时间,他们发热的可能性比成年人更高(比值比=4.47,95%置信区间2.35 - 8.51)。在农田里使用蚊帐的情况非常好(使用率98%),但家中储备抗疟药的情况并不常见。尽管距离医疗服务机构很远,但55.8%(37.9 - 72.8)的发热发作病例在医疗机构接受了治疗,而在家自行处理的情况较少见(37%,17.4 - 50.5)。
生活在农田似乎并不会导致更高的发热风险。蚊帐的使用和在医疗机构对发热的治疗反映了对疟疾的认识。在农田无法获得药物可能有助于减少药物的不合理使用,但可能给贫困农户带来额外负担。需要采取综合方法来改善就医机会,同时确保合理用药并保护脆弱的生计。