Pineau L, Desbuquois C, Marchetti B, Luu Duc D
Biotech-Germande, Marseilles, France.
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Feb;68(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.10.021. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
Following a French circular published in 2001, the use of glutaraldehyde for the disinfection of reusable medical devices was abandoned in favour of non-fixative disinfectants such as peracetic-acid-based solutions. Data published regarding the fixative properties of alternative disinfectants remain contradictory. We compared the effect of repetitive treatments of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes, contaminated by a liquid medium inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using five different disinfectant solutions: two peracetic acid solutions (with and without an activator), glutaraldehyde, ortho-phthaldehyde and succine dialdehyde. The results confirmed that repeated treatments of a PTFE tube with a 2% glutaraldehyde solution induce an important accumulation and/or fixation of protein, compared to peracetic-acid-based disinfectants, for which the accumulation and/or fixation of proteins remain low and vary from one formulation to another.
2001年法国发布通知后,戊二醛不再用于可重复使用的医疗器械消毒,转而采用非固定性消毒剂,如过氧乙酸基溶液。关于替代消毒剂固定特性的已发表数据仍相互矛盾。我们比较了用五种不同消毒剂溶液对被接种铜绿假单胞菌的液体培养基污染的聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)管进行重复处理的效果:两种过氧乙酸溶液(含和不含活化剂)、戊二醛、邻苯二甲醛和丁二醛。结果证实,与过氧乙酸基消毒剂相比,用2%戊二醛溶液对PTFE管进行重复处理会导致蛋白质大量积累和/或固定,而过氧乙酸基消毒剂的蛋白质积累和/或固定量仍然很低,且因配方不同而有所差异。