Launsø Laila, Skovgaard Lasse
The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):69-77. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0593.
The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society (a patient organization) has initiated a research-based bridge-building and integrative treatment project to take place from 2004 to 2010 at a specialized MS hospital. The background for initiating the project was an increasing use of alternative treatment documented among persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). From PwMS there has been an increasing demand upon The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society to initiate the project.
The overall purpose of the project is to examine whether collaboration between 5 conventional and 5 alternative practitioners may optimize treatment results for people who have multiple sclerosis (MS). The specific aim of this paper is to present tools used in developing collaboration between the conventional and alternative practitioners.
Two main tools in developing collaboration between the practitioners are described: (1) the planning and conduction of 4 practitioner-researcher seminars in the prephase of the project before recruiting patients with MS; and (2) the IMCO scheme (which is an abbreviation of Intervention, Mechanism, Context, and Outcomes). This tool was developed and used at practitioner-researcher seminars to make visible the different practitioners' treatment models and the patient-related treatment courses.
Examples of IMCO schemes filled in by the medical doctor and the classical homeopath illustrate significant differences in interventions, assumptions concerning effect mechanisms, and awareness of contexts facilitating and inhibiting the intervention to generate the outcomes expected and obtained.
The IMCO schemes have been an important tool in developing the team-based treatment approaches and to facilitate self-reflection on the professional role as a health care provider. We assume that the IMCO scheme will be of real value in the development of effective treatment based on collaboration between conventional and alternative practitioners.
丹麦多发性硬化症协会(一个患者组织)发起了一个基于研究的桥梁搭建与综合治疗项目,该项目于2004年至2010年在一家专门的多发性硬化症医院开展。启动该项目的背景是,多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)中使用替代疗法的情况日益增多。PwMS对丹麦多发性硬化症协会发起该项目的需求也在不断增加。
该项目的总体目的是研究5名传统从业者和5名替代疗法从业者之间的合作是否能优化多发性硬化症(MS)患者的治疗效果。本文的具体目的是介绍在传统从业者和替代疗法从业者之间建立合作时所使用的工具。
描述了在从业者之间建立合作的两个主要工具:(1)在招募MS患者之前的项目前期阶段,规划并举办4次从业者-研究人员研讨会;(2)IMCO方案(干预、机制、背景和结果的缩写)。这个工具是在从业者-研究人员研讨会上开发并使用的,目的是使不同从业者的治疗模式以及与患者相关的治疗过程清晰可见。
医生和古典顺势疗法医生填写的IMCO方案示例表明,在干预措施、对作用机制的假设以及对促进和抑制干预以产生预期和实际结果的背景的认识方面存在显著差异。
IMCO方案一直是开发基于团队的治疗方法以及促进对作为医疗服务提供者的专业角色进行自我反思的重要工具。我们认为,IMCO方案在基于传统从业者和替代疗法从业者合作的有效有效治疗的开发中将具有实际价值。