Cline Hollis, Haas Kurt
Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbour, NY 11724, USA.
J Physiol. 2008 Mar 15;586(6):1509-17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.150029. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
The synaptotropic hypothesis, which states that synaptic inputs control the elaboration of dendritic (and axonal) arbors was articulated by Vaughn in 1989. Today the role of synaptic inputs in controlling neuronal structural development remains an area of intense research activity. Several recent studies have applied modern molecular genetic, imaging and electrophysiological methods to this question and now provide strong evidence that maturation of excitatory synaptic inputs is required for the development of neuronal structure in the intact brain. Here we critically review data concerning the hypothesis with the expectation that understanding the circumstances when the data do and do not support the hypothesis will be most valuable. The synaptotrophic hypothesis contributes at both conceptual and mechanistic levels to our understanding of how relatively minor changes in levels or function of synaptic proteins may have profound effects on circuit development and plasticity.
突触趋向性假说由沃恩于1989年提出,该假说认为突触输入控制着树突(和轴突)分支的形成。如今,突触输入在控制神经元结构发育中的作用仍是一个研究热点领域。最近的几项研究已将现代分子遗传学、成像和电生理方法应用于这个问题,现在有强有力的证据表明,完整大脑中神经元结构的发育需要兴奋性突触输入的成熟。在此,我们审慎地回顾有关该假说的数据,期望了解数据支持和不支持该假说的情况将最具价值。突触营养假说在概念和机制层面都有助于我们理解突触蛋白水平或功能的相对微小变化如何对神经回路发育和可塑性产生深远影响。