Fabarius Alice, Li Ruhong, Yerganian George, Hehlmann Ruediger, Duesberg Peter
III Medizinische Klinik Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Wiesbadener Str. 7-11, 68305 Mannheim, Germany.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008 Jan 15;180(2):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2007.10.006.
Several researchers, including us, have recently proposed that specific karyotypes, rather than specific mutations, generate the "biochemical individuality" of cancers, defined by individual growth rates, metabolisms, drug-resistances, metastases and cell morphologies. According to our theory, independent karyotypic evolutions generate cancers, much like new phylogenetic species. To allow such evolutions in the lifetime of an organism, the normal karyotype must be destabilized, but not the genes. The karyotype is destabilized by aneuploidy, because aneuploidy unbalances conserved teams of proteins that segregate, synthesize and repair chromosomes. And aneuploidy is induced either by carcinogens or spontaneously. Here, we tested this theory using a new system that virtually excludes spontaneous mutation. In this sytem, 50% of normal human muscle cells became aneuploid and 5 per 10(6) formed foci of transformed Mu6 cells - only 2 months after transfection with 6 virus-activated cellular genes. Analyses of 10 foci revealed: (1) clonal karyotypes, consisting of one or more stemlines of spontaneously evolving aneuploidies and some non-clonal aneuploidies, and (2) individual phenotypes, such as cell morphologies, growth rates and intrinsic resistance to cytosine arabinoside, shared by 5 foci with a common stemline. Due to the short preneoplastic latencies of Mu6 cells several non-clonal precursors of focus-specific, aneuploid karyotypes were detectable before focus formation. Chemical carcinogens were also found to induce tumors with clonally evolving stemlines in Chinese hamsters. We conclude that specific clones of spontaneously evolving karyotypes, rather than specific mutations, generate the individuality of cancers. This answers the age-old question, why even cancers of the same kind do not have consistent karyotypes.
包括我们在内的几位研究人员最近提出,特定的核型而非特定的突变产生了癌症的“生化个体性”,这种个体性由个体生长速率、代谢、耐药性、转移和细胞形态所定义。根据我们的理论,独立的核型进化产生癌症,这很像新的系统发育物种。为了在生物体的生命周期内允许这种进化,正常核型必须不稳定,但基因不能不稳定。非整倍体使核型不稳定,因为非整倍体使参与染色体分离、合成和修复的保守蛋白质组失衡。非整倍体可由致癌物诱导产生,也可自发产生。在此,我们使用一个几乎排除自发突变的新系统对这一理论进行了测试。在这个系统中,50%的正常人肌肉细胞变成了非整倍体,每10⁶个细胞中有5个形成了转化的Mu6细胞灶——在用6个病毒激活的细胞基因转染后仅2个月。对10个灶的分析显示:(1)克隆核型,由一个或多个自发进化的非整倍体主干系和一些非克隆性非整倍体组成;(2)个体表型,如细胞形态、生长速率和对阿糖胞苷的内在抗性,5个具有共同主干系的灶共享这些表型。由于Mu6细胞的肿瘤前期潜伏期较短,在灶形成之前就可以检测到一些灶特异性非整倍体核型的非克隆前体。还发现化学致癌物在中国仓鼠中诱导具有克隆进化主干系的肿瘤。我们得出结论,自发进化核型的特定克隆而非特定突变产生了癌症的个体性。这回答了一个由来已久的问题,即为什么即使是同一种癌症也没有一致的核型。