Lianfu Zhang, Zelong Liu
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi 214122, China.
Ultrason Sonochem. 2008 Jul;15(5):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
The extracting technology including ultrasonic and microwave assisted extraction (UMAE) and ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) of lycopene from tomato paste were optimized and compared. The results showed that the optimal conditions for UMAE were 98 W microwave power together with 40 KHz ultrasonic processing, the ratio of solvents to tomato paste was 10.6:1 (V/W) and the extracting time should be 367 s; as for UAE, the extracting temperature was 86.4 degrees C, the ratio of the solvents to tomato paste was 8.0:1 (V/W) and the extracting time should be 29.1 min, while the percentage of lycopene yield was 97.4% and 89.4% for UMAE and UAE, respectively. These results implied that UMAE was far more efficient extracting method than UAE.
对番茄酱中番茄红素的提取技术进行了优化和比较,包括超声和微波辅助提取(UMAE)以及超声辅助提取(UAE)。结果表明,UMAE的最佳条件为微波功率98W、超声频率40KHz、溶剂与番茄酱的比例为10.6:1(V/W)、提取时间为367s;对于UAE,提取温度为86.4℃,溶剂与番茄酱的比例为8.0:1(V/W),提取时间为29.1min,UMAE和UAE的番茄红素产率分别为97.4%和89.4%。这些结果表明,UMAE是比UAE更高效的提取方法。