• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作学习模式在培训心理健康研究人员和黑人社区领袖合作技能方面的试点测试。

Pilot test of cooperative learning format for training mental health researchers and black community leaders in partnership skills.

作者信息

Laborde Danielle J, Brannock Kristen, Breland-Noble Alfiee, Parrish Theodore

机构信息

HERMES, LLC, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Dec;99(12):1359-68.

PMID:18229772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2575926/
Abstract

To support reduction of racial disparities in mental health diagnosis and treatment, mental health researchers and black community-based organization (CBO) leaders need training on how to engage in collaborative research partnerships. In this study, we pilot tested a series of partnership skills training modules for researchers and CBO leaders in a collaborative learning format. Two different sets of three modules, designed for separate training of researchers and CBO leaders, covered considering, establishing and managing mental health research partnerships and included instructions for self-directed activities and discussions. Eight CBO leaders participated in 10 sessions, and six researchers participated in eight sessions. The effectiveness of the training content and format was evaluated through standardized observations, focus group discussions, participant evaluation forms and retrospective pre-/posttests to measure perceived gains in knowledge. Participants generally were satisfied with the training experience and gained new partnership knowledge and skills. Although the CBO leaders were more engaged in the cooperative learning process, this training format appealed to both audiences. Pilot testing demonstrated that: 1) our modules can equip researchers and CBO leaders with new partnership knowledge and skills and 2) the cooperative learning format is a well-received and suitable option for mental health research partnership training.

摘要

为了支持减少心理健康诊断和治疗中的种族差异,心理健康研究人员和以黑人社区为基础的组织(CBO)领导人需要接受关于如何建立合作研究伙伴关系的培训。在本研究中,我们以协作学习的形式对研究人员和CBO领导人的一系列伙伴关系技能培训模块进行了试点测试。为研究人员和CBO领导人分别设计的两组不同的三个模块,涵盖了考虑、建立和管理心理健康研究伙伴关系,并包括自我指导活动和讨论的说明。八名CBO领导人参加了10次课程,六名研究人员参加了8次课程。通过标准化观察、焦点小组讨论、参与者评估表和回顾性前/后测试来评估培训内容和形式的有效性,以衡量在知识方面的感知收获。参与者总体上对培训体验感到满意,并获得了新的伙伴关系知识和技能。尽管CBO领导人更积极参与合作学习过程,但这种培训形式对两个受众都有吸引力。试点测试表明:1)我们的模块可以为研究人员和CBO领导人提供新的伙伴关系知识和技能;2)合作学习形式是心理健康研究伙伴关系培训中一种广受欢迎且合适的选择。

相似文献

1
Pilot test of cooperative learning format for training mental health researchers and black community leaders in partnership skills.合作学习模式在培训心理健康研究人员和黑人社区领袖合作技能方面的试点测试。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Dec;99(12):1359-68.
2
Activating older adults with serious mental illness for collaborative primary care visits.激活有严重精神疾病的老年患者以参与协作式初级保健访视。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Dec;36(4):278-88. doi: 10.1037/prj0000024. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
A literature review of knowledge translation and partnership research training programs for health researchers.健康研究人员知识转化和伙伴关系研究培训计划的文献回顾。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0497-z.
5
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
6
Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher's experiences from 20 projects.合作和伙伴关系研究以改善卫生和社会服务:研究人员从 20 个项目中获得的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 30;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0.
7
Midwifery education for safe motherhood.安全孕产的助产士教育。
Midwifery. 1997 Sep;13(3):115-24. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(97)90001-2.
8
Increasing minority research participation through collaboration with community outpatient clinics: the STEP-BD Community Partners Experience.通过与社区门诊合作增加少数民族参与研究:STEP-BD 社区合作伙伴经验。
Clin Trials. 2009 Aug;6(4):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1740774509338427. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
9
The community leaders institute: an innovative program to train community leaders in health research.社区领导学院:一个培训社区健康研究领导者的创新项目。
Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280d8de.
10
Feasibility of disaster mental health preparedness training for black communities.黑人群体灾难心理健康准备培训的可行性。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Jun;7(3):302-12. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2012.18.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement.基于社区组织参与要素的系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):e474-e484. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12533. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
The Significance of Strategic Community Engagement in Recruiting African American Youth & Families for Clinical Research.战略社区参与在招募非裔美国青年及家庭参与临床研究中的意义。
J Child Fam Stud. 2012 Apr 1;21(2):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9472-1. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Practicing HIV/AIDS community-based research.开展基于社区的艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究。
AIDS Care. 2006 Oct;18(7):731-8. doi: 10.1080/09540120500307735.
2
Building interdisciplinary/intersectoral research partnerships for community-based mental health research with older minority adults.建立跨学科/跨部门研究伙伴关系,以开展针对老年少数族裔成年人的社区心理健康研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):79-93. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9059-y.
3
Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: a method for respecting diversity in research partnerships.跨学科合作中的文化能力:一种尊重研究伙伴关系中多样性的方法。
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9064-1.
4
Racial, cultural and ethnic disparities in health and mental health: toward theory and research at community levels.健康与心理健康方面的种族、文化和族裔差异:迈向社区层面的理论与研究
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Mar;35(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-1882-z.
5
Fear, black people and mental illness: a vicious circle?恐惧、黑人与精神疾病:恶性循环?
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Sep;12(5):439-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00506.x.
6
Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit.社区和学术界能否在公共卫生研究方面开展合作?来自底特律一个基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的评估结果。
J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):495-507. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.495.
7
A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis.一种扎根理论数据分析的综合技术。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Sep;35(5):654-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01897.x.
8
Mental health services in faith communities: the role of clergy in black churches.宗教团体中的心理健康服务:神职人员在黑人教会中的作用。
Soc Work. 2000 Jan;45(1):73-87. doi: 10.1093/sw/45.1.73.
9
Human diversity and professional competence. Training in clinical and counseling psychology revisited.人类多样性与专业能力。再谈临床与咨询心理学培训。
Am Psychol. 1994 Sep;49(9):792-6. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.9.792.
10
Public-academic linkages for culturally sensitive community mental health.
Community Ment Health J. 1991 Dec;27(6):473-88. doi: 10.1007/BF00752669.