Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Sargent College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave. West, Boston, MA 02214, USA.
World Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;6(2):68-74.
In the past, practice in mental health was guided by the belief that individuals with serious mental illnesses do not recover. The course of their illness was either seen pessimistically, as deteriorative, or optimistically, as a maintenance course. Research over the past thirty to forty years has indicted that belief and shown that a vision of recovery can be achieved for many individuals. People with serious mental illnesses have themselves published accounts of their own recovery as well as advocated for the development of recovery promoting services. In North America and other regions, policies have been developed to make recovery the guiding vision of services. Today, particularly in the United States, much effort is going into the transformation of services and systems to achieve recovery outcomes. Despite these trends, the idea of recovery remains controversial and, some say, even illusory. This article clarifies the meaning of the term "recovery", reviews the research and first person accounts providing a rationale for recovery, and sets out implications for developing recovery oriented services.
过去,心理健康实践受到这样一种信念的指导,即患有严重精神疾病的个体无法康复。他们的病程要么被悲观地视为恶化,要么被乐观地视为维持性病程。过去三四十年的研究表明,这种信念是错误的,并表明许多人可以实现康复。患有严重精神疾病的人自己也发表了关于自己康复的描述,并倡导开发促进康复的服务。在北美和其他地区,已经制定了政策,以使康复成为服务的指导愿景。今天,特别是在美国,人们正在努力将服务和系统转变为以康复为导向的结果。尽管存在这些趋势,但康复的理念仍然存在争议,有人甚至说它是虚幻的。本文澄清了“康复”一词的含义,回顾了为康复提供理论依据的研究和第一人称描述,并阐述了开发以康复为导向的服务的意义。