Garrido-Cervera Josè Antonio, Ruiz-Granados María Isabel, Cuesta-Vargas Antonio Ignacio, Sánchez-Guarnido Antonio José
Grupo Clinimetría en Fisioterapia (CTS 631), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand) Grupo Clinimetria (F-14), 29590 Málaga, Spain.
Clin Pract. 2024 Oct 31;14(6):2313-2328. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14060181.
To implement recovery-oriented practice, it is important to have instruments capable of evaluating such practice. A number of different questionnaires have been developed in recent years which measure recovery orientation in mental health services.
To identify and analyze patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) reported in the literature that are related to recovery-oriented practice in mental health services.
This study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Searches were carried out in the Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline (via Pubmed), and SCOPUS databases and in grey literature repositories (Google Scholar, Opengrey, Dart-Europe, Teseo). Papers on recovery services for adults suffering from mental disorders (MDs) were included. Those focusing on addiction and intellectual disability care services were excluded.
Sixteen papers met the inclusion criteria. The selected PREMs mainly identified recovery-oriented systems, treatment, community integration and support as the dimensions addressed most frequently in questionnaires. The average number of items included in the questionnaires was found to be 54. With regard to psychometric properties, 62% of the papers evaluated reliability (internal consistency) and 56% provided some kind of evidence of validity.
This review aims to give an overview of the existing instruments in the literature and to highlight the characteristics of each one of them. Several different PREMs exist which evaluate recovery-oriented practice. No instrument currently exists which could be described as a benchmark tool, but there are quite a few with good psychometric properties capable of producing data that are useful when evaluating clinical services.
为了实施以康复为导向的实践，拥有能够评估此类实践的工具非常重要。近年来已经开发了许多不同的问卷来衡量心理健康服务中的康复导向。
识别和分析文献中报道的与心理健康服务中以康复为导向的实践相关的患者报告体验测量工具（PREMs）。
本研究遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围综述方法。在科学网、CINAHL、Medline（通过PubMed）和SCOPUS数据库以及灰色文献库（谷歌学术、OpenGrey、Dart-Europe、Teseo）中进行了搜索。纳入了关于患有精神障碍（MDs）的成年人康复服务的论文。排除了那些专注于成瘾和智力残疾护理服务的论文。
16篇论文符合纳入标准。所选的PREMs主要将以康复为导向的系统、治疗、社区融合和支持确定为问卷中最常涉及的维度。发现问卷中包含的项目平均数量为54个。关于心理测量特性，62%的论文评估了信度（内部一致性），56%提供了某种效度证据。
本综述旨在概述文献中现有的工具，并突出每个工具的特点。存在几种不同的PREMs来评估以康复为导向的实践。目前不存在可以被描述为基准工具的工具，但有相当一部分具有良好心理测量特性的工具能够产生在评估临床服务时有用的数据。
