Yoshitake Tadamasa, Nakamura Katsumasa, Shioyama Yoshiyuki, Nomoto Satoshi, Ohga Saiji, Toba Takashi, Shiinoki Takehiro, Anai Shigeo, Terashima Hiromi, Kishimoto Junji, Honda Hiroshi
Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):50-5. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0189-4. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
The aim of this study was to present the technical aspects of the breath-hold technique with respiratory monitoring and visual feedback and to evaluate the feasibility of this system in healthy volunteers.
To monitor respiration, the vertical position of the fiducial marker placed on the patient's abdomen was tracked by a machine vision system with a charge-coupled device camera. A monocular head-mounted display was used to provide the patient with visual feedback about the breathing trace. Five healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this study. They held their breath at the end-inspiration and the end-expiration phases. They performed five repetitions of the same type of 15-s breath-holds with and without a head-mounted display, respectively. A standard deviation of five mean positions of the fiducial marker during a 15-s breath-hold in each breath-hold type was used as the reproducibility value of breath-hold.
All five volunteers well tolerated the breath-hold maneuver. For the inspiration breath-hold, the standard deviations with and without visual feedback were 1.74 mm and 0.84 mm, respectively (P = 0.20). For the expiration breath-hold, the standard deviations with and without visual feedback were 0.63 mm and 0.96 mm, respectively (P = 0.025).
Our newly developed system might help the patient achieve improved breath-hold reproducibility.
本研究旨在介绍采用呼吸监测和视觉反馈的屏气技术的技术细节,并评估该系统在健康志愿者中的可行性。
为监测呼吸,通过带有电荷耦合器件相机的机器视觉系统跟踪放置在患者腹部的基准标记的垂直位置。使用单目头戴式显示器向患者提供关于呼吸轨迹的视觉反馈。五名健康男性志愿者参与了本研究。他们分别在吸气末和呼气末屏气。他们分别在有和没有头戴式显示器的情况下,对同类型的15秒屏气进行了五次重复。每种屏气类型在15秒屏气期间基准标记五个平均位置的标准差用作屏气的再现性值。
所有五名志愿者对屏气动作耐受性良好。对于吸气屏气,有和没有视觉反馈时的标准差分别为1.74毫米和0.84毫米(P = 0.20)。对于呼气屏气,有和没有视觉反馈时的标准差分别为0.63毫米和0.96毫米(P = 0.025)。
我们新开发的系统可能有助于患者提高屏气的再现性。