• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读基本过程计算模型的限制因素。

Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.

作者信息

Besner Derek, Wartak Szymon, Robidoux Serje

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):242-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.242.

DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.242
PMID:18248152
Abstract

There are numerous reports in the visual word recognition literature that the joint effects of various factors are additive on reaction time. A central claim by D. C. Plaut and J. R. Booth (2000, 2006) is that their parallel distributed processing model simulates additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in the context of lexical decision. If correct, this success would have important implications for computational accounts of reading processes. However, the results of further simulations with this model undermine this claim given that the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency yield a nonmonotonic function (underadditivity, additivity, and overadditivity) depending on the size of the stimulus quality effect, whereas skilled readers yield additivity more broadly. The implications of these results both locally and more globally are discussed, and a number of other issues are noted. Additivity of factor effects constitutes a benchmark that computational accounts should strive to meet.

摘要

在视觉单词识别文献中有大量报告表明,各种因素对反应时间的联合效应是可加性的。D. C. 普劳特和J. R. 布斯(2000年、2006年)的一个核心观点是,他们的并行分布式处理模型在词汇判断的背景下模拟了刺激质量和单词频率的加性效应。如果这是正确的,那么这一成功将对阅读过程的计算解释产生重要影响。然而,用该模型进行的进一步模拟结果削弱了这一观点,因为刺激质量和单词频率的联合效应会根据刺激质量效应的大小产生非单调函数(次加性、加性和超加性),而熟练读者的加性效应更为广泛。本文讨论了这些结果在局部和更全局层面的影响,并指出了一些其他问题。因素效应的加性构成了计算解释应努力达到的一个基准。

相似文献

1
Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.阅读基本过程计算模型的限制因素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):242-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.242.
2
Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?视觉单词识别中的并行分布式处理和词汇语义效应:需要几个阶段?
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.181.
3
Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009).阅读任务中因素效应的可加性对计算模型来说仍是一项挑战:对齐格勒、佩里和佐尔齐(2009年)的回应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):312-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014555.
4
Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中反应时间分布的相加和交互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):274-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.274.
5
Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.视觉单词识别中的交互激活:空间注意力和语义的联合效应所施加的限制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Dec;30(6):1064-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1064.
6
Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).大声朗读和词汇判断中刺激质量与词频联合效应的质性差异:对Yap和Balota(2007)研究的扩展
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):451-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451.
7
[Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].[词汇语义变量在视觉单词识别中的作用]
Psicothema. 2006 Aug;18(3):485-91.
8
Computational modelling of the effects of semantic dementia on visual word recognition.语义性痴呆对视觉词汇识别影响的计算建模。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar;27(2):101-14. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.502887. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
9
Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: masked priming effects.追踪正在成长的阅读者正字法技能的习得:掩蔽启动效应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Jul;97(3):165-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
10
Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.大声朗读:作为语境函数的刺激质量与词频之间关系的质性差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1400-11. doi: 10.1037/a0013084.

引用本文的文献

1
Reading Aloud: Discrete Stage(s) Redux.大声朗读:离散阶段再现
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 27;8:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00218. eCollection 2017.
2
Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.重新审视试验历史对加性效应和交互效应的调节作用。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):480-492. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0666-z.
3
Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.词汇判断中的语义丰富性效应:反馈的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1148-67. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0536-0.
4
Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity.语义启动和词频联合效应中的个体差异:词汇完整性的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):303. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001.