Poduska Jeanne M, Kellam Sheppard G, Wang Wei, Brown C Hendricks, Ialongo Nicholas S, Toyinbo Peter
American Institutes for Research, 921 E Fort Avenue, Suite 225, Baltimore, MD 21230, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jun 1;95 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a classroom behavior management strategy focused on socializing children to the role of student and aimed at reducing early aggressive, disruptive behavior, a confirmed antecedent to service use. The GBG was tested in a randomized field trial in 19 elementary schools with two cohorts of children as they attended first and second grades. This article reports on the impact of the GBG on service use through young adulthood.
Three or four schools in each of five urban areas were matched and randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) GBG, (2) an intervention aimed at academic achievement, or (3) the standard program of the school system. Children were assigned to classrooms to ensure balance, and teachers and classrooms were randomly assigned to intervention conditions.
This study provides evidence of a positive impact of a universal preventive intervention on later service use by males, although not by females, for problems with emotions, behavior, or drugs or alcohol. For both cohorts, males in GBG classrooms who had been rated as highly aggressive, disruptive by their teachers in the fall of first grade had a lower rate of school-based service use than their counterparts in control classrooms. REPLICATION: The design employed two cohorts of students. Although both first- and second-grade teachers received less training and support with the second cohorts of students than with the first cohort, the impact of GBG was similar across both cohorts.
良好行为游戏(GBG)是一种课堂行为管理策略,专注于使儿童适应学生角色,并旨在减少早期攻击性行为和破坏性行为,这些行为是确定的使用服务的先兆。GBG在19所小学针对两个队列的儿童进行了随机现场试验,这些儿童分别就读于一年级和二年级。本文报告了GBG对青年期服务使用的影响。
五个城市地区的三到四所学校进行匹配,并随机分配到以下三种情况之一:(1)GBG,(2)一项针对学业成绩的干预措施,或(3)学校系统的标准项目。儿童被分配到各个教室以确保平衡,教师和教室被随机分配到干预情况中。
本研究提供了证据,表明一种普遍的预防性干预措施对男性后期的服务使用有积极影响,尽管对女性没有影响,这些服务涉及情绪、行为、毒品或酒精问题。对于两个队列,在一年级秋季被教师评为高度攻击性和破坏性的GBG教室中的男性,其校内服务使用率低于对照教室中的同龄人。
该设计采用了两个学生队列。尽管一年级和二年级的教师对第二批学生的培训和支持都比对第一批学生少,但GBG在两个队列中的影响相似。