• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

告知患者家族性糖尿病风险:他们作何反应?一项横断面调查。

Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Qureshi Nadeem, Kai Joe

机构信息

Division of Primary Care, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, University of Nottingham, Derby City General Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 7;8:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-37.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-8-37
PMID:18257922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2275238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A strong family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) confers increased DM risk. This survey analysis determined whether patients who were informed by their doctors of familial DM risk acknowledged that risk and took steps to reduce it.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of the National Health Styles 2004 mail survey. All non-diabetic participants who responded to the question of whether their doctor had or had not informed them of their familial DM risk (n = 3,323) were compared for their risk-reducing behaviour and attitude to DM risk.

RESULTS

Forty-one percent (n = 616) of the question responders that had DM family histories were informed by their doctors of their familial risk; the chance of being informed increased with the number of relatives that had the disease. Members of the informed group were more likely than those in the non-informed group to report lifestyle changes to prevent DM (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-5.2) and being tested for DM (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.4-3.6), although no significant improvement occurred in their U.S.-recommended exercise activity (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1). Overall, informed responders recognised both their familial and personal DM risk; most discussed diabetes with their family (69%), though less so with friends (42%); however, 44% of them still did not consider themselves to be at risk.

CONCLUSION

Responders who were informed by their doctors of being at familial DM risk reported greater incidences of lifestyle changes, DM screening, and awareness of risk than non-informed responders. Doctors were more likely to inform patients with stronger DM family histories. Identifying this higher risk group, either in isolation or in combination with other recognised risk factors, offers doctors the opportunity to target limited health promotion resources efficiently for primary DM prevention.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病(DM)的家族病史强烈会增加患糖尿病的风险。本次调查分析确定了那些被医生告知有家族性糖尿病风险的患者是否承认这种风险并采取措施降低风险。

方法

我们对2004年全国健康状况邮件调查进行了分析。比较了所有回答医生是否告知其家族性糖尿病风险问题的非糖尿病参与者(n = 3323)的降低风险行为和对糖尿病风险的态度。

结果

有糖尿病家族史的问题回答者中,41%(n = 616)被医生告知了家族风险;被告知的可能性随着患该病亲属的数量增加而增加。与未被告知组相比,被告知组更有可能报告为预防糖尿病而改变生活方式(优势比[OR] 4.3,95%置信区间[CI] 3.5 - 5.2)以及接受糖尿病检测(OR 2.9,95% CI 2.4 - 3.6),尽管他们在美国推荐的体育活动方面没有显著改善(OR 0.9,95% CI 0.7 - 1.1)。总体而言,被告知的回答者认识到他们的家族性和个人糖尿病风险;大多数人与家人讨论过糖尿病(69%),但与朋友讨论的较少(42%);然而,其中44%的人仍然不认为自己有风险。

结论

被医生告知有家族性糖尿病风险的回答者报告的生活方式改变、糖尿病筛查和风险意识的发生率高于未被告知的回答者。医生更有可能告知糖尿病家族病史更强的患者。识别这个高风险群体,无论是单独识别还是与其他公认的风险因素结合识别,都为医生提供了一个机会,以便有效地将有限的健康促进资源用于原发性糖尿病预防。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a944/2275238/5861c545b1c5/1472-6963-8-37-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a944/2275238/5861c545b1c5/1472-6963-8-37-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a944/2275238/5861c545b1c5/1472-6963-8-37-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey.告知患者家族性糖尿病风险:他们作何反应?一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 7;8:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-37.
2
Family history of type 2 diabetes: a population-based screening tool for prevention?2型糖尿病家族史:一种基于人群的预防筛查工具?
Genet Med. 2006 Feb;8(2):102-8. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000200949.52795.df.
3
Awareness of diabetes risks is associated with healthy lifestyle behavior in diabetes free American adults: evidence from a nationally representative sample.在非糖尿病美国成年人中,对糖尿病风险的认识与健康的生活方式行为相关:来自全国代表性样本的证据。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Jul;6(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
Type 2 diabetes mellitus risk assessment among doctors in Ondo state.在翁多州的医生中进行 2 型糖尿病风险评估。
Malawi Med J. 2021 Jun;33(2):114-120. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v33i2.6.
5
Diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease: awareness and practice among doctors working in public general out-patient clinics in Kowloon West Cluster of Hong Kong.香港九龙西联网的公立普通科门诊医生对糖尿病与牙周病的认知和实践。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Dec 17;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0887-2.
6
Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans.2型糖尿病基因检测与咨询能否降低可改变的风险因素?一项针对退伍军人的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1591-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3315-5. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
7
Cardiovascular endurance and heart rate variability in adolescents with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.1型或2型糖尿病青少年的心血管耐力和心率变异性
Biol Res Nurs. 2005 Jul;7(1):16-29. doi: 10.1177/1099800405275202.
8
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
9
Crossing family histories of diabetes and cardiovascular disease leads to unexpected outcomes in diabetic offspring.糖尿病和心血管疾病家族史的交叉导致糖尿病患者后代出现意外结果。
J Diabetes. 2019 Apr;11(4):301-308. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12840. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
10
Diabetes mellitus in the family: perceptions of offspring's risk.
Diabet Med. 1999 May;16(5):431-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00085.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between a First-Degree Family History and Self-Reported Personal History of Obesity, Diabetes, and Heart and Blood Conditions: Results From the All of Us Research Program.一级亲属肥胖、糖尿病和心血管疾病家族史与自我报告的个人肥胖、糖尿病和心血管疾病史的关联:来自“所有人”研究计划的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 21;12(22):e030779. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030779. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Developing and assessing a kin keeping scale with application to identifying central influencers in African American family networks.开发并评估一种亲属维系量表,并将其应用于识别非裔美国家庭网络中的核心影响者。
J Community Genet. 2023 Dec;14(6):593-603. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00665-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Family history of type 2 diabetes: a population-based screening tool for prevention?2型糖尿病家族史:一种基于人群的预防筛查工具?
Genet Med. 2006 Feb;8(2):102-8. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000200949.52795.df.
2
Genomic medicine for underserved minority populations in family medicine.面向家庭医学中服务不足的少数族裔群体的基因组医学。
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Aug 1;72(3):386-7.
3
The impact of family history of diabetes on glucose testing and counseling behavior in primary care.糖尿病家族史对初级保健中血糖检测及咨询行为的影响。
Family Involvement to Stop the Conversion of Prediabetes to Diabetes.
家庭参与预防糖尿病前期转化为糖尿病
Korean J Fam Med. 2023 Nov;44(6):303-310. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0019. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
4
Understanding the Process of Family Cancer History Collection and Health Information Seeking.理解家族癌症病史采集和健康信息搜索的过程。
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Oct;50(5):572-585. doi: 10.1177/10901981231152430. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Association of family history of cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) and individual health behaviours: Analysis of CARRS study from South Asia.家族心血管代谢疾病(CMDs)史与个体健康行为的关联:来自南亚 CARRS 研究的分析。
Indian Heart J. 2022 Jul-Aug;74(4):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
All things considered, my risk for diabetes is medium: A risk personalization process of familial risk for type 2 diabetes.综合考虑,我患糖尿病的风险处于中等水平:2 型糖尿病家族风险的风险个体化过程。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):169-181. doi: 10.1111/hex.12986. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Developing community-based health education strategies with family history: Assessing the association between community resident family history and interest in health education.制定基于社区的健康教育策略与家族史:评估社区居民家族史与对健康教育的兴趣之间的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;271:112160. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
8
Epidemiologic study of familial Type 2 Diabetes in Tehran.德黑兰2型糖尿病家族聚集性的流行病学研究。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):56-60. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_228_18.
9
Enhancing health literacy through co-design: development of culturally appropriate materials on genetic risk and customary consanguineous marriage.通过共同设计提高健康素养:开发关于遗传风险和传统近亲婚姻的文化适宜材料。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jan;20:e2. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000038. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Assessing family history of chronic disease in primary care: Prevalence, documentation, and appropriate screening.在初级保健中评估慢性病家族史:患病率、记录情况及适当筛查
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jan;63(1):e58-e67.
Diabetes Care. 2004 Sep;27(9):2247-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.9.2247.
4
Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by lifestyle intervention: implications for health policy.通过生活方式干预对2型糖尿病进行一级预防:对卫生政策的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):951-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00036.
5
Opportunistic screening for diabetes in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中对糖尿病进行机会性筛查。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):9-12. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.9.
6
Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States.美国糖尿病的终生风险。
JAMA. 2003 Oct 8;290(14):1884-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.14.1884.
7
Family history of diabetes as a potential public health tool.糖尿病家族史作为一种潜在的公共卫生工具。
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):152-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00588-3.
8
The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention.糖尿病预防计划(DPP):生活方式干预的描述
Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2165-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165.
9
Measuring and improving preventive care for patients with diabetes in primary health centers.在基层医疗中心测量并改善糖尿病患者的预防保健服务。
Am J Med Qual. 2002 Sep-Oct;17(5):179-84. doi: 10.1177/106286060201700504.
10
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.通过生活方式干预或二甲双胍降低2型糖尿病的发病率。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.