Fehlner-Gardiner Christine, Nadin-Davis Susan, Armstrong Janet, Muldoon Frances, Bachmann Peter, Wandeler Alexander
Centre of Expertise for Rabies, Ottawa Laboratory-Fallowfield, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario K2H 8P9, Canada.
J Wildl Dis. 2008 Jan;44(1):71-85. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-44.1.71.
A vaccination program for the control of terrestrial rabies in the province of Ontario, Canada, began in 1989. During the period between 1989 and 2004, over 13 million baits containing the live, attenuated rabies virus ERA-BHK21 were distributed across the province, with the aim of immunizing foxes by the oral route. Animals recovered from bait distribution areas were assayed by fluorescent antibody test for rabies virus infection. Immunoreactivity with a panel of monoclonal antibodies that discriminate between ERA and rabies virus variants known to circulate in Ontario, and molecular genetic analyses were used to identify animals infected with ERA. Nine cases of ERA variant rabies were identified over the 16-yr period of study; these did not appear to be stratified by species, year of discovery, or location of capture. The ERA-positive animals were found across the province in eight counties, all of which had been baited in the year of case discovery. The nine ERA-positive cases included four red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), two raccoons (Procyon lotor), two striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), and one bovine calf (Bos taurus). Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the partial N gene sequences generated from these isolates indicated that these nine cases were due to infection with the ERA variant. The glycoprotein sequences were predicted from G gene sequencing of all nine field isolates and two laboratory stock ERA viruses. This revealed some heterogeneity at residue 120 (either arginine or histidine) in both field and laboratory stocks as well as a few other mutations in field isolates. The significance of this heterogeneity remains unclear. Our data demonstrate that the ERA vaccine distributed in Ontario carried residual pathogenicity; however, there does not appear to be any evidence of ERA establishment in wildlife populations over the 16-yr period. These results are consistent with previous reports of the rare detection of ERA vaccine-induced rabies and with laboratory studies of ERA pathogenicity.
加拿大安大略省于1989年启动了一项控制陆生狂犬病的疫苗接种计划。在1989年至2004年期间,全省共分发了超过1300万个含有减毒活狂犬病病毒ERA - BHK21的诱饵,目的是通过口服途径使狐狸免疫。从诱饵投放区域回收的动物通过荧光抗体试验检测狂犬病病毒感染情况。使用一组能区分ERA和已知在安大略省传播的狂犬病病毒变种的单克隆抗体进行免疫反应性检测,并通过分子遗传学分析来鉴定感染ERA的动物。在16年的研究期间共鉴定出9例ERA变种狂犬病病例;这些病例似乎未按物种、发现年份或捕获地点进行分层。在全省8个县发现了ERA阳性动物,所有这些县在病例发现当年都投放过诱饵。9例ERA阳性病例包括4只赤狐(赤狐属)、2只浣熊(浣熊属)、2只条纹臭鼬(臭鼬属)和1头牛犊(牛属)。对这些分离株产生的部分N基因序列进行的分子系统发育分析表明,这9例病例是由ERA变种感染所致。通过对所有9株野外分离株和2株实验室保存的ERA病毒进行G基因测序预测了糖蛋白序列。这揭示了野外分离株和实验室保存毒株在第120位残基(精氨酸或组氨酸)存在一些异质性,以及野外分离株中的其他一些突变。这种异质性的意义尚不清楚。我们的数据表明,在安大略省分发的ERA疫苗具有残余致病性;然而,在16年期间似乎没有任何证据表明ERA在野生动物种群中得以确立。这些结果与先前关于罕见检测到ERA疫苗诱导的狂犬病的报告以及ERA致病性的实验室研究结果一致。