Thomas Valerie, Lambert Susan
School of Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Mar;16(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00846.x.
To explore the perceptions of staff working in and referring to community-based intermediate care teams in Wales.
Central and devolved governments have high expectations of intermediate care to promote independence and quality of life for older people and to solve the system pressures within the acute hospital sector. Developing an evidence base of the effectiveness of a model of care that is characterized by diversity and difference in practice is problematic.
Fourth generation ethnographic evaluation involving focus groups, non-participant observations and semi-structured interviews with people working within and referring to intermediate care teams. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS: Strong evidence of interprofessional working demonstrated by shared responsibility, coordinated rather than parallel services, understanding of other organizations and recognition and resolution of conflict areas. This generated work which traditional measures would not identify.
Evaluation is inherent in the work of healthcare professionals and managers. Managers need to aware of the systems and structures within which they are required to manage. This is important for intermediate care services as the heterogeneity contributes to the challenges encountered by managers when seeking to describe services and measure their effectiveness. Applying an appropriate evaluation framework will facilitate both.
探讨威尔士社区中级护理团队工作人员及转诊人员的看法。
中央政府和下放权力的政府对中级护理寄予厚望,期望其能促进老年人的独立性和生活质量,并缓解急症医院部门的系统压力。建立一个以实践中的多样性和差异性为特征的护理模式有效性的证据基础存在问题。
采用第四代人种志评估方法,包括焦点小组、非参与观察以及对中级护理团队内部工作人员和转诊人员进行半结构化访谈。初步结果:有充分证据表明存在跨专业协作,体现在共同责任、服务协调而非并行、对其他组织的了解以及对冲突领域的认识和解决上。这产生了传统衡量方法无法识别的工作。
评估是医疗保健专业人员和管理人员工作的固有组成部分。管理人员需要了解他们进行管理所需的系统和结构。这对中级护理服务很重要,因为其异质性导致管理人员在描述服务和衡量其有效性时面临挑战。应用适当的评估框架将有助于实现这两点。