Dijkstra Peter D, Preenen Paul T Y
Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 May 22;275(1639):1157-62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1700.
A study by Rowe et al. reported a winning bias for judo athletes wearing a blue outfit relative to those wearing a white one during the 2004 Olympics. It was suggested that blue is associated with a higher likelihood of winning through differential effects of colour on opponent visibility and/or an intimidating effect on the opponent. However, we argue that there is no colour effect on winning in judo. We show that alternative factors, namely allocation biases, asymmetries in prior experience and differences in recovery time are possible confounding factors in the analysis of Rowe et al. After controlling for these factors, we found no difference in blue and white wins. We further analysed contest outcomes of 71 other major judo tournaments and also found no winning bias. Our findings have implications for sports policy makers: they suggest that a white-blue outfit pairing ensures an equal level of play.
罗等人的一项研究报告称,在2004年奥运会期间,相对于穿着白色服装的柔道运动员,穿着蓝色服装的柔道运动员存在获胜偏见。有人认为,蓝色与更高的获胜可能性相关,这是由于颜色对对手可见度的不同影响和/或对对手的威慑作用。然而,我们认为在柔道比赛中获胜不存在颜色效应。我们表明,其他因素,即分配偏差、先前经验的不对称以及恢复时间的差异,可能是罗等人分析中的混杂因素。在控制这些因素后,我们发现蓝色服装和白色服装的获胜情况没有差异。我们进一步分析了其他71场主要柔道比赛的比赛结果,也没有发现获胜偏见。我们的研究结果对体育政策制定者有启示意义:它们表明白色 - 蓝色服装搭配能确保比赛的公平性。