Correia Ma Lurdes, Carvalho Saudade, Fortuna Jorge, Pereira Ma Henriqueta
Clinical Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Feb;34(1):21-5. doi: 10.1007/s12016-007-8030-5.
It was the aim of this study to compare the diagnostic properties of two second generation anti-CCP antibodies assays (Quanta Lite CCP, Inova and EliA CCP, Phadia) with an assay containing a new antigen mixture (Quanta Lite CCP 3, Inova) and RF IgM.
Sera from 86 RA patients and 90 control patients with other diseases, such as infections, connective tissue diseases, or other rheumatic diseases, were analysed using the four different methods. Specificity (84.4%) and PPV (80.3%) were lowest for RF IgM and highest for EliA CCP (specificity 97.8%, PPV 96.7%), the other values being close to those of EliA CCP. Sensitivity was highest for Quanta Lite CCP (73.3%). Efficiency was highest for Quanta Lite CCP (84.1%) at the lower cut off followed by EliA CCP at both cut offs (83.0%). The discrimination between RA sera (mean value 407.67 U/ml) and control sera (4.54 U/ml) and the relative risk (23.34) were best for EliA CCP. The results of this study reveal that there was no advantage of the anti-CCP antibodies assay applying a new antigen mixture (Quanta Lite CCP 3 ELISA) compared to two second generation anti-CCP antibodies assays (Quanta Lite CCP ELISA and EliA CCP).
本研究旨在比较两种第二代抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP,Inova公司;EliA CCP,Phadia公司)与一种含有新抗原混合物的检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP 3,Inova公司)以及类风湿因子IgM的诊断性能。
使用这四种不同方法对86例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和90例患有其他疾病(如感染、结缔组织病或其他风湿性疾病)的对照患者的血清进行分析。类风湿因子IgM的特异性(84.4%)和阳性预测值(PPV,80.3%)最低,EliA CCP的特异性最高(97.8%),PPV为96.7%,其他值与EliA CCP接近。Quanta Lite CCP的敏感性最高(73.3%)。在较低临界值时,Quanta Lite CCP的效率最高(84.1%),其次是两种临界值下的EliA CCP(83.0%)。EliA CCP对RA血清(平均值407.67 U/ml)和对照血清(4.54 U/ml)的区分度以及相对风险(23.34)最佳。本研究结果表明,与两种第二代抗CCP抗体检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP ELISA和EliA CCP)相比,应用新抗原混合物的抗CCP抗体检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP 3 ELISA)并无优势。