Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎(RA)患者与对照患者中三种抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体检测方法与类风湿因子的比较。

Comparison of three anti-CCP antibody tests and rheumatoid factor in RA and control patients.

作者信息

Correia Ma Lurdes, Carvalho Saudade, Fortuna Jorge, Pereira Ma Henriqueta

机构信息

Clinical Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Feb;34(1):21-5. doi: 10.1007/s12016-007-8030-5.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

It was the aim of this study to compare the diagnostic properties of two second generation anti-CCP antibodies assays (Quanta Lite CCP, Inova and EliA CCP, Phadia) with an assay containing a new antigen mixture (Quanta Lite CCP 3, Inova) and RF IgM.

METHODS

Sera from 86 RA patients and 90 control patients with other diseases, such as infections, connective tissue diseases, or other rheumatic diseases, were analysed using the four different methods. Specificity (84.4%) and PPV (80.3%) were lowest for RF IgM and highest for EliA CCP (specificity 97.8%, PPV 96.7%), the other values being close to those of EliA CCP. Sensitivity was highest for Quanta Lite CCP (73.3%). Efficiency was highest for Quanta Lite CCP (84.1%) at the lower cut off followed by EliA CCP at both cut offs (83.0%). The discrimination between RA sera (mean value 407.67 U/ml) and control sera (4.54 U/ml) and the relative risk (23.34) were best for EliA CCP. The results of this study reveal that there was no advantage of the anti-CCP antibodies assay applying a new antigen mixture (Quanta Lite CCP 3 ELISA) compared to two second generation anti-CCP antibodies assays (Quanta Lite CCP ELISA and EliA CCP).

摘要

未标注

本研究旨在比较两种第二代抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP,Inova公司;EliA CCP,Phadia公司)与一种含有新抗原混合物的检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP 3,Inova公司)以及类风湿因子IgM的诊断性能。

方法

使用这四种不同方法对86例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和90例患有其他疾病(如感染、结缔组织病或其他风湿性疾病)的对照患者的血清进行分析。类风湿因子IgM的特异性(84.4%)和阳性预测值(PPV,80.3%)最低,EliA CCP的特异性最高(97.8%),PPV为96.7%,其他值与EliA CCP接近。Quanta Lite CCP的敏感性最高(73.3%)。在较低临界值时,Quanta Lite CCP的效率最高(84.1%),其次是两种临界值下的EliA CCP(83.0%)。EliA CCP对RA血清(平均值407.67 U/ml)和对照血清(4.54 U/ml)的区分度以及相对风险(23.34)最佳。本研究结果表明,与两种第二代抗CCP抗体检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP ELISA和EliA CCP)相比,应用新抗原混合物的抗CCP抗体检测方法(Quanta Lite CCP 3 ELISA)并无优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验