• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立卫生研究院的网络评估:美国顾客满意度指数在线顾客调查的应用

Web evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index online customer survey.

作者信息

Wood Fred B, Siegel Elliot R, Feldman Sue, Love Cynthia B, Rodrigues Dennis, Malamud Mark, Lagana Marie, Crafts Jennifer

机构信息

National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2008 Feb 15;10(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.944.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.944
PMID:18276580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2483849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), realized the need to better understand its Web users in order to help assure that websites are user friendly and well designed for effective information dissemination. A trans-NIH group proposed a trans-NIH project to implement an online customer survey, known as the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) survey, on a large number of NIH websites-the first "enterprise-wide" ACSI application, and probably the largest enterprise Web evaluation of any kind, in the US government. The proposal was funded by the NIH Evaluation Set-Aside Program for two years at a cost of US $1.5 million (US $1.275 million for survey licenses for 60 websites at US $18000 per website; US $225,000 for a project evaluation contractor).

OBJECTIVE

The overall project objectives were to assess the value added to the participating NIH websites of using the ACSI online survey, identify any NIH-wide benefits (and limitations) of the ACSI, ascertain any new understanding about the NIH Web presence based on ACSI survey results, and evaluate the effectiveness of a trans-NIH approach to Web evaluation. This was not an experimental study and was not intended to evaluate the ACSI survey methodology, per se, or the impacts of its use on customer satisfaction with NIH websites.

METHODS

The evaluation methodology included baseline pre-project websites profiles; before and after email surveys of participating website teams; interviews with a representative cross-section of website staff; observations of debriefing meetings with website teams; observations at quarterly trans-NIH Web staff meetings and biweekly trans-NIH leadership team meetings; and review and analysis of secondary data.

RESULTS

Of the original 60 NIH websites signed up, 55 implemented the ACSI survey, 42 generated sufficient data for formal reporting of survey results for their sites, and 51 completed the final project survey. A broad cross-section of websites participated, and a majority reported significant benefits and new knowledge gained from the ACSI survey results. NIH websites as a group scored consistently higher on overall customer satisfaction relative to US government-wide and private sector benchmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the enterprise-wide experiment was successful. On the level of individual websites, the project confirmed the value of online customer surveys as a Web evaluation method. The evaluation results indicated that successful use of the ACSI, whether site-by-site or enterprise-wide, depends in large part on strong staff and management support and adequate funding and time for the use of such evaluative methods. In the age of Web-based e-government, a broad commitment to Web evaluation may well be needed. This commitment would help assure that the potential of the Web and other information technologies to improve customer and citizen satisfaction is fully realized.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/4db785847e39/jmir_v10i1e4_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/51fe3efb5e94/jmir_v10i1e4_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/867290ebe51a/jmir_v10i1e4_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/4db785847e39/jmir_v10i1e4_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/51fe3efb5e94/jmir_v10i1e4_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/867290ebe51a/jmir_v10i1e4_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc22/2483849/4db785847e39/jmir_v10i1e4_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)下属的国立卫生研究院(NIH)意识到,有必要更好地了解其网站用户,以确保网站对用户友好且设计合理,便于有效传播信息。一个跨NIH的团队提出了一个跨NIH项目,即在大量NIH网站上开展一项在线客户满意度调查,即美国客户满意度指数(ACSI)调查,这是美国政府首个“全机构范围”的ACSI应用,可能也是规模最大的全机构范围的任何类型的网络评估。该提案由NIH评估预留计划资助,为期两年,费用为150万美元(其中127.5万美元用于60个网站的调查许可,每个网站18000美元;22.5万美元用于项目评估承包商)。

目的

项目的总体目标是评估使用ACSI在线调查为参与的NIH网站带来的附加值,确定ACSI在全NIH范围内的益处(和局限性),根据ACSI调查结果确定对NIH网站形象的新认识,并评估跨NIH网络评估方法的有效性。这不是一项实验性研究,也并非旨在评估ACSI调查方法本身,或其使用对用户对NIH网站满意度的影响。

方法

评估方法包括项目前网站的基线概况;对参与网站团队进行电子邮件调查前后的情况;与具有代表性的网站工作人员进行访谈;观察与网站团队的汇报会议;观察每季度的跨NIH网络工作人员会议和每两周一次的跨NIH领导团队会议;以及对二手数据的审查和分析。

结果

最初报名的60个NIH网站中,55个实施了ACSI调查,42个生成了足够的数据用于正式报告其网站的调查结果,51个完成了最终项目调查。众多不同类型的网站参与其中,大多数网站报告称从ACSI调查结果中获得了显著益处和新知识。相对于美国政府整体和私营部门的基准,NIH网站作为一个整体在总体客户满意度方面得分一直较高。

结论

总体而言,全机构范围的实验是成功的。在单个网站层面,该项目证实了在线客户调查作为一种网络评估方法的价值。评估结果表明,成功使用ACSI,无论是逐站点还是全机构范围,在很大程度上取决于强大的工作人员和管理支持,以及使用此类评估方法的充足资金和时间。在基于网络的电子政务时代,可能非常需要对网络评估做出广泛承诺。这一承诺将有助于确保充分实现网络和其他信息技术在提高客户和公民满意度方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
Web evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index online customer survey.美国国立卫生研究院的网络评估:美国顾客满意度指数在线顾客调查的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Feb 15;10(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.944.
2
Use of Internet audience measurement data to gauge market share for online health information services.利用互联网受众测量数据来评估在线健康信息服务的市场份额。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e31.
3
The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI): A sample dataset and description.美国顾客满意度指数(ACSI):一个样本数据集及说明。
Data Brief. 2023 Apr 11;48:109123. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109123. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Veterans' voices: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users' characteristics, needs, and preferences.退伍军人之声:利用美国顾客满意度指数(ACSI)调查来确定 My HealtheVet 个人健康记录用户的特征、需求和偏好。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):203-11. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000240.
5
Content and functionality of alcohol and other drug websites: results of an online survey.酒精及其他毒品相关网站的内容与功能:一项在线调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1449.
6
Making Quality Health Websites a National Public Health Priority: Toward Quality Standards.将高质量健康网站列为国家公共卫生优先事项:迈向质量标准。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 2;18(8):e211. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5999.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.流量来源以及访客对在线质量公开报告的偏好:网络分析与在线调查结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.
9
eHealth Search Patterns: A Comparison of Private and Public Health Care Markets Using Online Panel Data.电子健康搜索模式:使用在线面板数据对私营和公共医疗保健市场的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 13;19(4):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6739.
10
eMental health experiences and expectations: a survey of youths' Web-based resource preferences in Canada.电子心理健康体验与期望:加拿大青少年基于网络的资源偏好调查
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 17;16(12):e293. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3526.

引用本文的文献

1
Are we making a difference? Outreach evaluation in practice.我们正在产生影响吗?实践中的外展评估。
Inf Serv Use. 2022 Apr 26;41(3-4):241-254. doi: 10.3233/ISU-210126. eCollection 2021.
2
A Decade of Veteran Voices: Examining Patient Portal Enhancements Through the Lens of User-Centered Design.十年老兵之声:通过以用户为中心的设计视角审视患者门户网站的改进
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 10;20(7):e10413. doi: 10.2196/10413.
3
VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes.VA 开放医嘱:探索早期患者采用者访问临床医嘱的体验。

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of user messages to MedlinePlus.gov.对发送至MedlinePlus.gov的用户消息的分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jan;95(1):81-3.
2
Exploring e-Health usage and interest among cancer information service users: the need for personalized interactions and multiple channels remains.探索癌症信息服务用户对电子健康的使用情况和兴趣:个性化互动和多渠道的需求仍然存在。
J Health Commun. 2005;10 Suppl 1:35-52. doi: 10.1080/10810730500265609.
3
Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):380-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003144. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Veterans' voices: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users' characteristics, needs, and preferences.退伍军人之声:利用美国顾客满意度指数(ACSI)调查来确定 My HealtheVet 个人健康记录用户的特征、需求和偏好。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):203-11. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000240.
健康信息的信任与来源:互联网的影响及其对医疗保健提供者的启示:首次健康信息国家趋势调查结果
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618.
4
A decade devoted to improving online health information quality.致力于提高在线健康信息质量的十年。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:891-6.
5
Use of Internet audience measurement data to gauge market share for online health information services.利用互联网受众测量数据来评估在线健康信息服务的市场份额。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e31.
6
The role of user input in shaping online information from the National Cancer Institute.用户输入在塑造美国国立癌症研究所在线信息方面的作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e25.
7
Searching for cancer information on the internet: analyzing natural language search queries.在互联网上搜索癌症信息:分析自然语言搜索查询
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Dec 11;5(4):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e31.
8
The US National Library of Medicine in the 21st century: expanding collections, nontraditional formats, new audiences.21世纪的美国国立医学图书馆:扩充馆藏、采用非传统形式、面向新受众。
Health Info Libr J. 2002 Sep;19(3):126-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00382.x.
9
Usability issues in developing a Web-based consumer health site.开发基于网络的消费者健康网站中的可用性问题。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:556-60.
10
An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the National Cancer Institute's Web site: CancerNet.对美国国立癌症研究所网站“癌症网”(CancerNet)上信息的可读性和文化敏感性分析。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Oct;27(9):1403-9.