Davey P G, Williams A H
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Apr;27 Suppl B:43-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_b.43.
We have examined case records for patients who received teicoplanin alone for endocarditis or Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. All patients with streptococcal endocarditis were cured (viridans group 14/14; Group D 4/4). Cure rates for other organisms were: Enterococcus faecalis 3/5; S. aureus 5/10 and coagulase negative staphylococci 2/3. Doses for six patients who failed because of poor response were 3.3-4.2 mg/kg. Teicoplanin treatment cured 41/48 patients with S. aureus bacteraemia; treatment failed in two patients because of adverse events. Doses in the remaining treatment failures were 2.1-5.0 mg/kg. In comparison, 48 patients in Dundee hospitals received ten different drugs in 20 combinations for S. aureus bacteraemia; 29 patients received cloxacillin or flucloxacillin but initial doses varied from 0.25-2.0 g. We conclude that the European database does provide evidence that teicoplanin monotherapy is effective for serious infection with Gram-positive bacteria. Doses for staphylococcal infection should probably be at least 6 mg/kg. The upper limit of the teicoplanin dosage range remains to be determined but there is evidently considerable confusion about appropriate regimens for 'standard' therapy.