Sanders Tom, Harrison Stephen
Division of Primary Care, University of Manchester, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Mar;30(2):289-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01052.x.
The pattern of occupations engaged in the care of patients has grown steadily more complex, and is characterised by the creation of new occupations, additional specialisation within existing occupations, and extensions to existing occupational roles. This paper presents empirical data from a study of professionals working with heart failure patients in the English National Health Service, focusing on the discourses employed by nurses and by three different specialties within medicine to legitimise their occupational boundaries. We identify four themes that characterise such discourses, specialised expertise, competence, organisational efficiency and patient-centredness, though these are deployed to different degrees by the different professions. The findings point to a theory of 'occupational legitimation talk' in which newer occupations utilise a wider set of legitimacy claims as a means of strengthening their role and credibility within an increasingly complex and fluid healthcare environment.
参与患者护理的职业模式日益复杂,其特点是出现了新职业、现有职业内部进一步专业化以及现有职业角色的扩展。本文展示了一项对英国国家医疗服务体系中从事心力衰竭患者护理工作的专业人员的研究得出的实证数据,重点关注护士以及医学领域三个不同专业为使其职业界限合法化而采用的话语。我们确定了此类话语的四个主题,即专业知识、能力、组织效率和以患者为中心,尽管不同职业对这些主题的运用程度有所不同。研究结果指向一种“职业合法化话语”理论,即新出现的职业利用更广泛的合法性主张,作为在日益复杂多变的医疗环境中强化其角色和可信度的一种手段。