Hopwood Christopher J, Morey Leslie C, Edelen Maria Orlando, Shea M Tracie, Grilo Carlos M, Sanislow Charles A, McGlashan Thomas H, Daversa Maria T, Gunderson John G, Zanarini Mary C, Markowitz John C, Skodol Andrew E
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2008 Mar;20(1):81-5. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.81.
Interview methods are widely regarded as the standard for the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), whereas self-report methods are considered a time-efficient alternative. However, the relative validity of these methods has not been sufficiently tested. The current study used data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality disorder Study to compare diagnostic base rates and the relative validity of interview and self-report methods for assessing functional outcome in BPD. Although self-report yielded higher base rates of criteria endorsement, results did not support the common assumption that diagnostic interviews are more valid than self-reports, but instead indicated the combined use of these methods optimally identifies BPD criteria.
访谈法被广泛认为是边缘性人格障碍（BPD）诊断的标准方法，而自我报告法被视为一种省时的替代方法。然而，这些方法的相对效度尚未得到充分检验。本研究使用了来自合作纵向人格障碍研究的数据，以比较诊断基础率以及访谈法和自我报告法在评估BPD功能结局方面的相对效度。尽管自我报告产生了更高的标准认可基础率，但结果并不支持诊断访谈比自我报告更有效的普遍假设，而是表明联合使用这些方法能最佳地识别BPD标准。
