Lo Cola S L, Ho Samuel M Y, Hollon Steven D
Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
Research on cognitive models of depression has identified negative cognitive styles and rumination as risk factors for depression. The present study examined the hypothesis that rumination mediates the effect of negative cognitive styles on depression. Specifically, we evaluated the differential effects of two aspects of rumination, characterized by brooding and reflection, on the relationship between negative cognitive styles and level of depressive symptoms. A total of 115 college students and 38 patients suffering from depressive disorders completed a battery of questionnaires measuring levels of depressive symptoms, brooding, reflection, and negative cognitive styles. The results support the notion that there exist two distinct dimensions of rumination and that, of the two, it is brooding and not reflection that mediates the relationship between negative cognitive styles and depression and contributes to its negative outcomes.
对抑郁症认知模型的研究已将消极认知风格和沉思认定为抑郁症的风险因素。本研究检验了沉思介导消极认知风格对抑郁症影响的这一假设。具体而言,我们评估了沉思的两个方面(以沉思和反思为特征)对消极认知风格与抑郁症状水平之间关系的不同影响。共有115名大学生和38名抑郁症患者完成了一系列问卷,这些问卷用于测量抑郁症状水平、沉思、反思和消极认知风格。结果支持了这样一种观点,即沉思存在两个不同维度,而且在这两个维度中,是沉思而非反思介导了消极认知风格与抑郁症之间的关系,并导致其消极后果。