Lopez Cristina M, Driscoll Kimberly A, Kistner Janet A
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2009 Jan;38(1):27-35. doi: 10.1080/15374410802575412.
In view of recent findings regarding the multifaceted nature of rumination in adults and older adolescents, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct of rumination as a 2-factor model (brooding and reflection) in a child and early adolescent sample as well as examine sex differences and associations between depressive symptoms and these ruminative subtypes. Participants were children in 2nd through 7th grades (N = 303). Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis that subtypes of rumination (2-factor model) are present in children and provided a better fit than a unitary construct of rumination (1-factor model). As predicted, girls endorsed higher levels of brooding than boys, and brooding (not reflection) was uniquely related to depressive symptoms. Results revealed that a distinction between brooding and reflection subtypes is warranted as it can help lead to better assessment and identification of risk factors of depression.
鉴于近期有关成年人和大龄青少年反刍多面性的研究发现,本研究旨在评估儿童和青少年早期样本中作为双因素模型(沉思和反思)的反刍结构,并检验抑郁症状与这些反刍亚型之间的性别差异和关联。参与者为二至七年级的儿童(N = 303)。验证性因素分析结果支持了以下假设:反刍亚型(双因素模型)存在于儿童中,并且比单一的反刍结构(单因素模型)拟合度更好。正如预测的那样,女孩的沉思水平高于男孩,并且沉思(而非反思)与抑郁症状存在独特关联。结果表明,区分沉思和反思亚型是有必要的,因为这有助于更好地评估和识别抑郁症的风险因素。