Liang Min, Chen Yu, Liu Yan, Xiong Ribo
Department of Gynecology &Obstetrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 9;15:1499061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1499061. eCollection 2024.
Negative cognitive styles (NCSs) have been identified as risk factor for the onset of depression. However, little empirical evidence is available to support its role in psychological disorders in the perinatal period. Moreover, less is known about the underlying mechanism in the relation between NCSs and depression in pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to examine the mediation effect of rumination on the relationship between NCSs and antenatal depression (AD). Specifically, the mediation effects of two subtypes of rumination were tested.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to May 2023 using anonymous online questionnaire among women in their third trimester of pregnancy in the antenatal care clinic of a tertiary hospital. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used to screen antenatal depression. Attributional Style Questionnaire and Ruminative Responses Scale were employed to assess NCSs and rumination respectively. Correlational analysis of the associations between NCSs, rumination, and AD was conducted. Bootstrap mediation analysis and multiple mediation models were applied to investigate whether rumination, and its brooding and reflection components would mediate the relationship between NCSs and AD.
NCSs had a significant positive effect on depression in pregnant women (c=1.45, SE=0.03, <0.001, 95%CI: 0.92∼1.70). Rumination mediated the relationship between NCSs and depression in pregnant women (point estimate=0.41, 95%CI: 0.13∼0.79, effect size=0.22, K = 0.19). Multiple mediation analysis revealed that brooding, instead of reflection, mediated the relationship between NCSs and depression in pregnant women (point estimate=0.41, 95%CI: 0.15∼0.78).
This study provided novel evidence for the role of rumination, specifically its brooding subtype, in shaping the link between NCSs and depression in pregnant women, highlighting potentially useful targets for interventions aimed at preventing the onset of AD.
消极认知风格已被确定为抑郁症发病的危险因素。然而,几乎没有实证证据支持其在围产期心理障碍中的作用。此外,关于消极认知风格与孕妇抑郁症之间关系的潜在机制,人们了解得更少。本研究的目的是检验沉思对消极认知风格与产前抑郁症(AD)之间关系的中介作用。具体而言,测试了两种沉思亚型的中介作用。
2023年2月至5月,在一家三级医院产前保健门诊对孕晚期妇女进行了一项横断面研究,采用匿名在线问卷。使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表筛查产前抑郁症。分别采用归因风格问卷和沉思反应量表评估消极认知风格和沉思。对消极认知风格、沉思和产前抑郁症之间的关联进行相关分析。应用Bootstrap中介分析和多重中介模型来研究沉思及其沉思和反思成分是否会中介消极认知风格与产前抑郁症之间的关系。
消极认知风格对孕妇抑郁症有显著的正向影响(c = 1.45,标准误 = 0.03,p < 0.001,95%置信区间:0.92 ∼ 1.70)。沉思中介了消极认知风格与孕妇抑郁症之间的关系(点估计 = 0.41,95%置信区间:0.13 ∼ 0.79,效应量 = 0.22,K = 0.19)。多重中介分析显示,是沉思而非反思中介了消极认知风格与孕妇抑郁症之间的关系(点估计 = 0.41,95%置信区间:0.15 ∼ 0.78)。
本研究为沉思,特别是其沉思亚型,在塑造消极认知风格与孕妇抑郁症之间的联系中的作用提供了新的证据,突出了针对预防产前抑郁症发作的干预措施的潜在有用靶点。