• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便标记的暗腔磁共振结肠造影:水灌肠和空气法结肠扩张检测结肠肿瘤的比较

Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.

作者信息

Rodriguez Gomez Sonia, Pagés Llinas Mario, Castells Garangou Antoni, De Juan Garcia Carmen, Bordas Alsina Josep M, Rimola Gibert Jordi, Ayuso Colella Juan R, Ayuso Colella Carmen

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinico of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):1396-405. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0900-6. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-008-0900-6
PMID:18320195
Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate MR colonography (MRC) with barium fecal tagging in detecting colorectal pathology and to determine how air-based and water-based colonic distension influences MRC. We studied 83 patients with high risk of colonic neoplasms. All received oral barium sulfate for colonic preparation before unenhanced and enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo MRC using either water (n=54) or air (n=29) for colonic distension. Fecal tagging, distension, and artifacts were recorded. All patients underwent conventional colonoscopy within 2 weeks of MRC; the techniques were compared for detection of malignant neoplasms and polyps >or=1 cm, 6-9 mm, and <or=5 mm. Fecal tagging was "good" in 76% of the colonic segments in water-distended patients and 46% of air-distended patients. The degree of distension was "good" in 90.7% of water-distended patients and 44% of air-distended patients. Severe artifacts were present in 15% air-distended patients and 0.3% of water-distended patients. Both water-distended and air-distended MRC detected all malignant neoplasms and polyps >or=1 cm, but more air-distended MRC were excluded for poor quality. MRC with fecal tagging is useful for detecting lesions >or=1 cm. Air distension was inferior to water distension in most aspects. Water-based colonic distension should be used for barium-tagging MRC.

摘要

本研究旨在评估钡剂粪便标记的磁共振结肠成像(MRC)在检测结直肠病变中的应用,并确定基于空气和基于水的结肠扩张对MRC的影响。我们研究了83例患结肠肿瘤风险较高的患者。所有患者在使用水(n = 54)或空气(n = 29)进行结肠扩张的未增强及增强T1加权梯度回波MRC检查前,均口服硫酸钡进行结肠准备。记录粪便标记、扩张情况及伪影。所有患者在MRC检查后2周内接受传统结肠镜检查;比较两种技术对恶性肿瘤及直径≥1 cm、6 - 9 mm和≤5 mm息肉的检测情况。在水扩张患者中,76%的结肠段粪便标记“良好”,在空气扩张患者中为46%。90.7%的水扩张患者扩张程度“良好”,空气扩张患者为44%。15%的空气扩张患者出现严重伪影,水扩张患者为0.3%。水扩张和空气扩张的MRC均检测出所有直径≥1 cm的恶性肿瘤和息肉,但更多空气扩张的MRC因质量差被排除。有粪便标记的MRC对检测直径≥1 cm的病变有用。在大多数方面,空气扩张不如水扩张。基于水的结肠扩张应用于钡剂标记的MRC检查。

相似文献

1
Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.粪便标记的暗腔磁共振结肠造影:水灌肠和空气法结肠扩张检测结肠肿瘤的比较
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):1396-405. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0900-6. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
2
Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.粪便标记:无需结肠清洁的磁共振结肠成像。
Abdom Imaging. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):410-7. doi: 10.1007/s00261-001-0121-9.
3
MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.粪便标记的磁共振结肠成像:硫酸钡与硅铁钡对比
Acad Radiol. 2008 May;15(5):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.11.014.
4
Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.基于粪便标记的黑腔磁共振结肠成像用于检测结直肠肿物:准确性及患者接受度
Abdom Imaging. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):576-83. doi: 10.1007/s00261-004-0290-4. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
5
Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience.结直肠肿瘤:脂肪灌肠磁共振结肠成像——初步临床经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 28;13(40):5371-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i40.5371.
6
MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.采用粪便标记技术和水性灌肠的磁共振结肠成像用于评估炎症性肠病。
Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Aug;34(8):585-94. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0552-4. Epub 2016 May 21.
7
MR colonography without bowel cleansing or water enema: a pilot study.MR 结肠成像术无需肠道清洁或灌肠:一项初步研究。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Jul;85(1015):921-4. doi: 10.1259/bjr/26473479. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
8
MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?磁共振结肠成像:用于结肠扩张时,空气与水相比效果如何?
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Feb;19(2):216-21. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10455.
9
Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography.在磁共振结肠成像中使用空气作为对比剂的可行性研究。
Clin Radiol. 2003 Jul;58(7):555-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00126-0.
10
MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.基于钡剂的粪便标记磁共振结肠成像:初步临床经验
Radiology. 2002 Apr;223(1):248-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2231010887.

引用本文的文献

1
MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.采用粪便标记技术和水性灌肠的磁共振结肠成像用于评估炎症性肠病。
Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Aug;34(8):585-94. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0552-4. Epub 2016 May 21.
2
MR colonography without bowel cleansing or water enema: a pilot study.MR 结肠成像术无需肠道清洁或灌肠:一项初步研究。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Jul;85(1015):921-4. doi: 10.1259/bjr/26473479. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
3
Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies.

本文引用的文献

1
MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.磁共振结肠成像与光学结肠镜检查:筛查人群中患者接受度的比较
Eur Radiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):2286-93. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0643-9. Epub 2007 May 24.
2
Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.无需肠道清洁的磁共振结肠成像:在筛查人群中的一项前瞻性横断面研究。
Gut. 2007 Aug;56(8):1079-85. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.109306. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
3
Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
磁共振结肠成像在结直肠病变检测中的应用:一项前瞻性研究的系统评价。
Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1031-46. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1663-4. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
黑腔磁共振结肠成像的优缺点:直径小于5mm的息肉在检测时的临床意义
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Nov;24(5):1088-94. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20734.
4
Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.结直肠息肉:暗腔磁共振结肠成像与传统结肠镜检查的检测比较
Radiology. 2006 Jan;238(1):143-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381041756. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
5
Clinical validation of high-resolution fast spin-echo MR colonography after colon distention with air.空气扩张结肠后高分辨率快速自旋回波磁共振结肠成像的临床验证
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Sep;22(3):400-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20397.
6
Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking)--a feasibility study.使用口服和直肠粪便软化剂(粪便裂解)的无需肠道清洁的磁共振结肠成像——一项可行性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2005 Oct;15(10):2079-87. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2838-2. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
7
Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.基于粪便标记的黑腔磁共振结肠成像用于检测结直肠肿物:准确性及患者接受度
Abdom Imaging. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):576-83. doi: 10.1007/s00261-004-0290-4. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
8
Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps.无需肠道准备的计算机断层结肠成像用于检测结直肠息肉
Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1300-11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.025.
9
Impact of diet on stool signal in dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography.饮食对暗腔磁共振结肠成像中粪便信号的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Aug;20(2):272-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20098.
10
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.计算机断层结肠成像(虚拟结肠镜检查):与标准结肠镜检查在检测结直肠肿瘤方面的多中心比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1713-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1713.