Suppr超能文献

磁共振结肠成像在结直肠病变检测中的应用:一项前瞻性研究的系统评价。

Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1031-46. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1663-4. Epub 2009 Nov 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR-colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed for comparative MR-colonography studies, published between May 1997 and February 2009, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. We included studies if MR-colonography findings were prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy in (a)symptomatic patients. Two reviewers independently extracted study design characteristics and data for summarising sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity in findings between studies was tested using I (2) test statistics. Sensitivity and specificity estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated on per patient basis and summary sensitivity on per polyp basis, using bivariate and univariate statistical models.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were found to be potentially relevant and 13 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The study population comprised 1,285 patients with a mean disease prevalence of 44% (range 22-63%). Sensitivity for the detection of CRC was 100%. Significant heterogeneity was found for overall per patient sensitivity and specificity. For polyps with a size of 10 mm or larger, per patient sensitivity and specificity estimates were 88% (95% CI 63-97%; I (2) = 37%) and 99% (95% CI 95-100%; I (2) = 60%). On a per polyp basis, polyps of 10 mm or larger were detected with a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 66-94%; I (2) = 51%). The data were too heterogeneous for polyps smaller than 6 mm and 6-9 mm.

CONCLUSION

MR-colonography can accurately detect colorectal polyps more than 10 mm in size.

摘要

目的

评估磁共振结肠成像(MR 结肠成像)对结直肠病变的诊断准确性。

方法

通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库,对 1997 年 5 月至 2009 年 2 月发表的比较性 MR 结肠成像研究进行全面文献检索。纳入的研究必须满足以下条件:(a)在症状患者中,前瞻性地将 MR 结肠成像结果与传统结肠镜检查结果进行比较;(b)研究设计为前瞻性、比较性、病例系列研究。两位审阅者独立提取研究设计特征和数据,以总结敏感性和特异性。使用 I (2)检验统计量检验研究间结果的异质性。采用双变量和单变量统计模型,计算基于每位患者和每个息肉的敏感性和特异性估计值及汇总敏感性。

结果

共发现 37 项研究具有潜在相关性,其中 13 项符合纳入标准。研究人群包括 1285 例患者,平均疾病患病率为 44%(范围 22%-63%)。CRC 的检测敏感性为 100%。总体基于每位患者的敏感性和特异性存在显著异质性。对于大小为 10mm 或更大的息肉,基于每位患者的敏感性和特异性估计值分别为 88%(95%CI:63%-97%;I (2)=37%)和 99%(95%CI:95%-100%;I (2)=60%)。基于每个息肉的大小,直径为 10mm 或更大的息肉的检测敏感性为 84%(95%CI:66%-94%;I (2)=51%)。对于直径小于 6mm 和 6-9mm 的息肉,数据异质性太大,无法进行分析。

结论

MR 结肠成像能够准确检测直径大于 10mm 的结直肠息肉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d3/2850516/2c743c63f599/330_2009_1663_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验