一种用于评估药学专业学生实习期间反思水平的分类方案。
A categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students' levels of reflection during internships.
作者信息
Wallman Andy, Lindblad Asa Kettis, Hall Stina, Lundmark Annika, Ring Lena
机构信息
Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Sweden.
出版信息
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Feb 15;72(1):05. doi: 10.5688/aj720105.
OBJECTIVE
To test the reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness of a categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students' levels of reflection during internships.
METHODS
Pharmacy interns at Uppsala University were asked to write a reflective essay about patient counseling at the start and end of their internships. A modified version of Kember's categorization scheme for assessing the level of reflection was used to evaluate these essays.
RESULTS
Based on their essay scores, the students' levels of reflection increased during the internship course (p < 0.001) The mean time for categorization was 3 minutes per essay. The interrater reliability of the 182 essays was kappa = 0.63.
CONCLUSIONS
The evaluation of the categorization scheme showed that it has good interrater reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness. This scheme might be useful in pharmacy practice educational settings, but needs further validation.
目的
测试一种用于评估药学专业学生实习期间反思水平的分类方案的可靠性、可行性和反应性。
方法
乌普萨拉大学的药学实习生被要求在实习开始和结束时撰写一篇关于患者咨询的反思性文章。采用肯伯评估反思水平分类方案的修改版来评估这些文章。
结果
根据文章得分，学生在实习期间的反思水平有所提高（p < 0.001）。每篇文章分类的平均时间为3分钟。182篇文章的评分者间信度kappa = 0.63。
结论
对该分类方案的评估表明，它具有良好的评分者间信度、可行性和反应性。该方案可能在药学实践教育环境中有用，但需要进一步验证。
Zotero 插件