Suppr超能文献

面对面和电子群组中的协作回忆。

Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups.

作者信息

Ekeocha Justina Ohaeri, Brennan Susan E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):245-61. doi: 10.1080/09658210701807480.

Abstract

When people remember shared experiences, the amount they recall as a collaborating group is less than the amount obtained by pooling their individual memories. We tested the hypothesis that reduced group productivity can be attributed, at least in part, to content filtering, where information is omitted from group products either because individuals fail to retrieve it or choose to withhold it (self-filtering), or because groups reject or fail to incorporate it (group-filtering). Three-person groups viewed a movie clip together and recalled it, first individually, then in face-to-face or electronic groups, and finally individually again. Although both kinds of groups recalled equal amounts, group-filtering occurred more often face-to-face, while self-filtering occurred more often electronically. This suggests that reduced group productivity is due not only to intrapersonal factors stemming from cognitive interference, but also to interpersonal costs of coordinating the group product. Finally, face-to-face group interaction facilitated subsequent individual recall.

摘要

当人们回忆共同经历时,作为一个协作小组所回忆起的内容量少于汇总他们各自记忆所获得的内容量。我们检验了这样一个假设:小组生产力的降低至少部分可归因于内容筛选,即信息从小组成果中被遗漏,要么是因为个体未能检索到它或选择隐瞒它(自我筛选),要么是因为小组拒绝或未能纳入它(小组筛选)。三人小组一起观看一段电影剪辑并进行回忆,先是各自单独回忆,然后以面对面或电子方式分组回忆,最后再次单独回忆。尽管两种小组回忆的内容量相等,但小组筛选在面对面时更常发生,而自我筛选在电子方式下更常发生。这表明小组生产力的降低不仅归因于认知干扰产生的个体内部因素,还归因于协调小组成果的人际成本。最后,面对面的小组互动促进了随后的个体回忆。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验