Barbosa Debora Barros, Barão Valentim Adelino Ricardo, Monteiro Douglas Roberto, Compagnoni Marco Antonio, Marra Juliê
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gerodontology. 2008 Dec;25(4):237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00218.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
Failure of bonding between acrylic resin teeth and denture base material is a considerable problem for patients who wear complete dentures.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between acrylic resins and resin denture teeth with different thermocycling and polymerisation methods.
Microwave-polymerised (Onda-Cryl), heat-polymerised (Clássico) and autopolymerising (Jet) acrylic resins and resin denture tooth (Biotone) were used. The acrylic resins were polymerised according to the following: (A) microwave - fast cycle, Onda-Cryl; (B) microwave - long cycle, Onda-Cryl; (C) microwave - manufacturer's cycle, Onda-Cryl; (T) water bath - long cycle, Clássico; and (Q) bench polymerisation cycle, Jet. Twenty specimens were prepared for each polymerisation method. Ten were thermocycled, and 10 did not receive thermocycling. For the purpose of the study, a shear test was used. Data were analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparisons test (p = 0.05).
Cycles B, C and T were similar (p > 0.05), and had statistically higher bonding values than cycles A and Q (p < 0.05) for the thermocycled and non-thermocycled groups. For all cycles, there were no statistically significant differences between thermocycled and non-thermocycled groups (p > 0.05), except for cycle Q (p = 0.0038).
Thermocycling decreased the bond strength, but not significantly for microwave and heat-polymerised cycles. Regarding the bond strength of denture teeth to acrylic resin, the fast microwave polymerisation cycle should be avoided when polymerising Onda-Cryl acrylic resin. In addition, Jet acrylic resin is not adequate for use in denture repair.
对于佩戴全口义齿的患者而言,丙烯酸树脂牙与义齿基托材料之间的粘结失败是一个相当严重的问题。
本研究旨在评估不同热循环和聚合方法下丙烯酸树脂与树脂义齿牙之间的粘结强度。
使用微波聚合(Onda-Cryl)、热聚合(Clássico)和自凝(Jet)丙烯酸树脂以及树脂义齿牙(Biotone)。丙烯酸树脂按照以下方式聚合:(A)微波 - 快速循环,Onda-Cryl;(B)微波 - 长时间循环,Onda-Cryl;(C)微波 - 制造商推荐循环,Onda-Cryl;(T)水浴 - 长时间循环,Clássico;以及(Q)台架聚合循环,Jet。每种聚合方法制备20个样本。其中10个进行热循环处理,10个不进行热循环处理。为进行本研究,采用剪切试验。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn多重比较检验进行分析(p = 0.05)。
对于热循环组和非热循环组,循环B、C和T相似(p > 0.05),且粘结值在统计学上高于循环A和Q(p < 0.05)。对于所有循环,除循环Q(p = 0.0038)外,热循环组和非热循环组之间在统计学上无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
热循环降低了粘结强度,但对于微波和热聚合循环而言,降低程度不显著。关于义齿牙与丙烯酸树脂的粘结强度,聚合Onda-Cryl丙烯酸树脂时应避免快速微波聚合循环。此外,Jet丙烯酸树脂不适用于义齿修复。