Hohepa Maea, Scragg Robert, Schofield Grant, Kolt Gregory S, Schaaf David
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Mar;12(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
The school day provides youth several opportunistic time periods to be active. How active youth are during these time periods or whether they engage in physical activity across multiple time periods is not well established. A cross-sectional sample of 12-18-year-old students (n=3471) were recruited from low socioeconomic status high schools within South Auckland, New Zealand. Participants reported their physical activity during lunchtime, morning recess, and after school, as well as their level of active transportation to and from school. For each physical activity opportunity participants were dichotomised as being either "more active" or "less active". Height, weight, and waist circumference measurements were also collected for each participant. Data were analysed using binary logistic regression to understand demographic associations and with kappa coefficient calculations to examine level of association in participation levels between different time periods. The percentage of students considered 'more active' depended on the physical activity variable of interest (after-school, 56.3%; active transportation, 58.1%; morning recess, 26.4%; lunchtime recess, 32.4%). Only 11.1% of participants were classified as 'more active' across all four physical activity opportunities. Substantial agreement (kappa=.68) was only observed in participation levels at lunchtime and morning recess. At-risk groups for lower physical activity were female students, senior students, and students of Asian/Other descent. During a school day multiple opportunistic time periods exist for youth to be active, yet a large proportion of students are not as active as they could be with few youth engaging in physical activity across various segments of the school day.
上学日为青少年提供了几个进行活动的机会时间段。青少年在这些时间段的活跃程度如何,或者他们是否在多个时间段参与体育活动,目前尚无定论。从新西兰奥克兰南部社会经济地位较低的高中招募了12至18岁学生的横断面样本(n = 3471)。参与者报告了他们在午餐时间、上午课间休息和放学后的身体活动情况,以及往返学校的主动出行水平。对于每个体育活动机会,参与者被分为“更活跃”或“不太活跃”两类。还收集了每个参与者的身高、体重和腰围测量数据。使用二元逻辑回归分析数据以了解人口统计学关联,并通过kappa系数计算来检查不同时间段参与水平的关联程度。被认为“更活跃”的学生百分比取决于所关注的体育活动变量(放学后,56.3%;主动出行,58.1%;上午课间休息,26.4%;午餐时间课间休息,32.4%)。在所有四个体育活动机会中,只有11.1%的参与者被归类为“更活跃”。仅在午餐时间和上午课间休息的参与水平上观察到高度一致性(kappa = 0.68)。体育活动较少的风险群体是女学生、高年级学生以及亚洲/其他族裔的学生。在上学日,青少年有多个进行活动的机会时间段,但很大一部分学生的活跃程度并未达到应有的水平,很少有青少年在学校一天的各个时段都参与体育活动。