Gangemi Ezio Nicola, Gregori Dario, Berchialla Paola, Zingarelli Enrico, Cairo Monica, Bollero Daniele, Ganem Jamal, Capocelli Roberto, Cuccuru Franca, Cassano Pompeo, Risso Daniela, Stella Maurizio
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, Traumatological Center, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;10(2):93-102. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.10.2.93.
To describe the clinical characteristics of postburn scars and determine the independent risk factors specific to these patients. While burns may generate widespread and disfiguring scars and have a dramatic influence on patient quality of life, the prevalence of postburn pathologic scarring is not well documented, and the impact of certain risk factors is poorly understood.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of the clinical records of 703 patients (2440 anatomic burn sites) treated at the Turin Burn Outpatient Clinic between January 1994 and May 15, 2006. Prevalence and evolution time of postburn pathologic scarring were analyzed with univariate and multivariate risk factor analysis by sex, age, burn surface and full-thickness area, cause of the burn, wound healing time, type of burn treatment, number of surgical procedures, type of surgery, type of skin graft, and excision and graft timing.
Pathologic scarring was diagnosed in 540 patients (77%): 310 had hypertrophic scars (44%); 34, contractures (5%); and 196, hypertrophic-contracted scars (28%). The hypertrophic induction was assessed at a median of 23 days after reepithelialization and lasted 15 months (median). A nomogram, based on the multivariate regression model, showed that female sex, young age, burn sites on the neck and/or upper limbs, multiple surgical procedures, and meshed skin grafts were independent risk factors for postburn pathologic scarring (Dxy 0.30).
The identification of the principal risk factors for postburn pathologic scarring not only would be a valuable aid in early risk stratification but also might help in assessing outcomes adjusted for patient risk.
描述烧伤后瘢痕的临床特征,并确定这些患者特有的独立危险因素。虽然烧伤可能会产生广泛且毁容性的瘢痕,并对患者的生活质量产生重大影响,但烧伤后病理性瘢痕的患病率尚无充分记录,某些危险因素的影响也知之甚少。
对1994年1月至2006年5月15日在都灵烧伤门诊治疗的703例患者(2440个解剖学烧伤部位)的临床记录进行回顾性分析。通过单因素和多因素危险因素分析,按性别、年龄、烧伤面积和全层面积、烧伤原因、伤口愈合时间、烧伤治疗类型、手术次数、手术类型、皮肤移植类型以及切除和移植时间,分析烧伤后病理性瘢痕的患病率和演变时间。
540例患者(77%)被诊断为病理性瘢痕:310例为增生性瘢痕(44%);34例为挛缩(5%);196例为增生性挛缩瘢痕(28%)。增生性瘢痕形成的评估在再上皮化后中位23天进行,持续15个月(中位时间)。基于多变量回归模型的列线图显示,女性、年轻、颈部和/或上肢烧伤部位、多次手术以及网状皮肤移植是烧伤后病理性瘢痕形成的独立危险因素(Dxy 0.30)。
确定烧伤后病理性瘢痕形成的主要危险因素不仅有助于早期风险分层,还可能有助于评估根据患者风险调整后的结果。