• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理模型与扇形效应。

Mental models and the fan effect.

作者信息

Radvansky G A, Zacks R T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1117.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(5):940-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.940.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.940
PMID:1834775
Abstract

Explanations of data from fan effect experiments have been based on propositional network models. This article presents findings not readily predicted by such models. In particular, in three experiments we found that, during a speeded-recognition test, subjects retrieved facts about several objects associated with a single location faster than facts about several locations associated with a single object. Indeed, there was no fan effect in the former case despite the fact that there were an equivalent number of associations among concepts in both conditions. We suggest that such data are consistent with a mental model representational account.

摘要

对扇形效应实验数据的解释一直基于命题网络模型。本文呈现了一些此类模型难以轻易预测的研究结果。具体而言,在三项实验中我们发现,在快速识别测试期间,受试者检索与单个位置相关的多个物体的事实,比检索与单个物体相关的多个位置的事实更快。事实上,在前一种情况下不存在扇形效应,尽管在两种条件下概念之间的联想数量相当。我们认为,这些数据与心理模型表征解释是一致的。

相似文献

1
Mental models and the fan effect.心理模型与扇形效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(5):940-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.940.
2
Mental model organization.心智模型组织
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jan;19(1):95-114. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.1.95.
3
Differential fan effect and attentional focus.差异风扇效应与注意力焦点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Aug;11(4):729-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03196627.
4
Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM).注意、空间表征与视觉忽视:在识别模型的选择性注意中模拟涌现性注意和空间记忆(SAIM)
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):29-87. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.29.
5
Language and memory for object location.语言与物体位置记忆。
Cognition. 2016 Aug;153:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
Category specificity in object agnosia: preservation of sensorimotor experiences related to objects.物体失认症中的类别特异性:与物体相关的感觉运动经验的保留。
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jan;37(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00045-1.
7
The fan effect: a tale of two theories.扇形效应:两种理论的故事。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Jun;128(2):198-206. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.2.198.
8
Simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis of the wechsler memory scale - revised for two standardization samples: a comparison of groups from Japan and the United States.韦氏记忆量表修订版针对两个标准化样本的同时验证性因素分析:日本和美国样本组的比较
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Aug;26(5):645-52. doi: 10.1080/13803390409609788.
9
Confabulation in a dysexecutive patient: implication for models of retrieval.
Cortex. 1997 Dec;33(4):743-52. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70731-7.
10
Recall and recognition in mild hypoxia: using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory.轻度缺氧中的回忆与识别:运用协方差结构建模检验外显记忆的竞争理论
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(5):672-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.09.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Ingroup sources enhance associative inference.内群体信息源增强联想推理。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Dec 14;1(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00043-8.
2
Targeted memory reactivation during sleep can induce forgetting of overlapping memories.睡眠期间靶向性记忆再激活可诱导重叠记忆的遗忘。
Learn Mem. 2022 Oct 17;29(11):401-411. doi: 10.1101/lm.053594.122. Print 2022 Nov.
3
The hippocampus constructs narrative memories across distant events.海马体构建跨越遥远事件的叙事记忆。
Curr Biol. 2021 Nov 22;31(22):4935-4945.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Narratives bridge the divide between distant events in episodic memory.叙事弥合了情节记忆中遥远事件之间的鸿沟。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Apr;50(3):478-494. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01178-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
5
Explicit (Not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing.显性(而非隐性)态度在句子处理过程中调节注意力焦点。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:583814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583814. eCollection 2020.
6
Event Boundaries in Memory and Cognition.记忆与认知中的事件边界
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Oct;17:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
Event models and the fan effect.事件模型与扇形效应
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):1028-1044. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0713-4.
8
Explanation can cause Forgetting: Memory Dynamics in the Generation of New Arguments.解释会导致遗忘:新论点生成中的记忆动态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1426-1435. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1283-y.
9
Forgetting "Novel" but Not "Dragon": The Role of Age of Acquisition on Intentional and Incidental Forgetting.忘记“新奇事物”却不忘“龙”:习得年龄对有意遗忘和无意遗忘的作用
PLoS One. 2016 May 10;11(5):e0155110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155110. eCollection 2016.
10
Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing.话语详述有助于句子处理中的检索。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 15;7:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00374. eCollection 2016.