• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显性(而非隐性)态度在句子处理过程中调节注意力焦点。

Explicit (Not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing.

作者信息

Horchak Oleksandr V, Garrido Margarida Vaz

机构信息

Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:583814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583814. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583814
PMID:33424698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786004/
Abstract

Many studies showed that comprehenders monitor changes in protagonists' emotions and actions. This article reports two experiments that explored how focusing comprehenders' attention on a particular property of the protagonist dimension (e.g., emotional or action state) affects the accessibility of information about target objects mentioned in the sentence. Furthermore, the present research examined whether participants' attitudes toward the issues described in the sentence can modulate comprehension processes. To this end, we asked participants to read sentences about environmental issues that focused comprehenders' attention on different mental and physical attributes of the same entities (protagonists and objects) and then self-report their own thoughts on the topic of environment by responding to the items assessing their environmental awareness. Importantly, we manipulated the task requirements across two experiments by administering a self-report task (Experiment 1), which required the participants to rate the seriousness and the frequency of the problem mentioned in a sentence; and administering a sentence-picture verification paradigm (Experiment 2), which required the participants to merely indicate if the object depicted in the picture (related to a certain environmental problem) was mentioned in the preceding sentence. The results of these experiments suggest that the focus of a sentence on the environmental problem (rather than the protagonist's emotion and action) enhances the accessibility of information about environmental issues (e.g., plastic garbage); that the comprehender's level of environmental awareness influences one's attention during sentence processing; and that comprehender characteristics significantly modulate comprehension processes only when the measures tap into explicit (and not implicit) processes.

摘要

许多研究表明,阅读理解者会监测主人公情绪和行为的变化。本文报告了两项实验,探究了将阅读理解者的注意力集中在主人公维度的特定属性(例如情绪或行为状态)上如何影响句子中提到的目标物体信息的可及性。此外,本研究还考察了参与者对句子中所描述问题的态度是否会调节理解过程。为此,我们要求参与者阅读关于环境问题的句子,这些句子将阅读理解者的注意力集中在相同实体(主人公和物体)的不同心理和物理属性上,然后通过回答评估其环境意识的项目来自我报告他们对环境主题的想法。重要的是,我们在两项实验中通过实施一项自我报告任务(实验1)来操纵任务要求,该任务要求参与者对句子中提到的问题的严重性和频率进行评分;以及实施一个句子-图片验证范式(实验2),该范式要求参与者仅指出图片中描绘的物体(与某个环境问题相关)是否在前一句中被提及。这些实验的结果表明,句子对环境问题的关注(而非主人公的情绪和行为)增强了关于环境问题(例如塑料垃圾)信息的可及性;阅读理解者的环境意识水平会影响句子处理过程中的注意力;并且只有当测量方法涉及显性(而非隐性)过程时,阅读理解者的特征才会显著调节理解过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/a67a3921fb8b/fpsyg-11-583814-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/d7ba8364c4f1/fpsyg-11-583814-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/3379c8488d0a/fpsyg-11-583814-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/a67a3921fb8b/fpsyg-11-583814-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/d7ba8364c4f1/fpsyg-11-583814-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/3379c8488d0a/fpsyg-11-583814-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb9/7786004/a67a3921fb8b/fpsyg-11-583814-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Explicit (Not Implicit) Attitudes Mediate the Focus of Attention During Sentence Processing.显性(而非隐性)态度在句子处理过程中调节注意力焦点。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:583814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583814. eCollection 2020.
2
Sentence-based mental simulations: Evidence from behavioral experiments using garden-path sentences.基于句子的心理模拟:使用花园路径句的行为实验证据。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):952-965. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01367-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
[Does action semantic knowledge influence mental simulation in sentence comprehension?].[动作语义知识会影响句子理解中的心理模拟吗?]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2012 Apr;83(1):10-7. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.83.10.
4
Simulating background settings during spoken and written sentence comprehension.模拟口语和书面句子理解过程中的背景环境。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1426-1439. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02061-9. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.有何新进展?一种有利于信息性的理解偏差。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104491. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104491. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Mental simulation of colour properties during language comprehension: influence of context and comprehension stages.语言理解过程中颜色属性的心理模拟:语境和理解阶段的影响。
Cogn Process. 2024 Nov;25(4):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01201-4. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
7
Is color continuously activated in mental simulations across a broader discourse context?在更广泛的话语语境下,心理模拟是否会持续激活颜色?
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jan;49(1):127-147. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01078-6.
8
Numerical Congruency Effect in the Sentence-Picture Verification Task.句子-图片验证任务中的数字一致性效应。
Exp Psychol. 2017 May;64(3):159-169. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000358.
9
How quantifiers influence the conceptual representation of plurals.量词如何影响复数的概念表示。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):803-814. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01121-6. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
10
Tracking and maintenance of goal-relevant location information in narratives.追踪和维护叙述中的与目标相关的位置信息。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):983-996. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00915-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Dropping bowling balls on tomatoes: Representations of object state-changes during sentence processing.扔保龄球砸番茄:句子处理过程中物体状态变化的表述。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 May;47(5):838-857. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000980. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Is Complex Visual Information Implicated During Language Comprehension? The Case of Cast Shadows.复杂视觉信息在语言理解过程中起作用吗?以投射阴影为例。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;44(7):e12870. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12870.
3
Predicting Behavior With Implicit Measures: Disillusioning Findings, Reasonable Explanations, and Sophisticated Solutions.
用内隐测量法预测行为:令人失望的发现、合理的解释及精妙的解决方案
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 8;10:2483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02483. eCollection 2019.
4
The influence of state change on object representations in language comprehension.状态变化对语言理解中客体表征的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):390-399. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00977-7.
5
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
6
Testing the effectiveness of the Internet-based instrument PsyToolkit: A comparison between web-based (PsyToolkit) and lab-based (E-Prime 3.0) measurements of response choice and response time in a complex psycholinguistic task.测试基于互联网的 PsyToolkit 工具的有效性:在一项复杂心理语言学任务中,比较基于网络的(PsyToolkit)和基于实验室的(E-Prime 3.0)对反应选择和反应时间的测量。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0221802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221802. eCollection 2019.
7
Events as intersecting object histories: A new theory of event representation.事件作为相交的对象历史:一种新的事件表示理论。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Nov;126(6):817-840. doi: 10.1037/rev0000154. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Linguistic Focus Promotes the Ease of Discourse Integration Processes in Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.语言焦点促进阅读理解中语篇整合过程的流畅性:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;9:2718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02718. eCollection 2018.
9
Are visual processes causally involved in "perceptual simulation" effects in the sentence-picture verification task?视觉过程是否在句子-图片验证任务中的“知觉模拟”效应中起因果作用?
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Extending Situated Language Comprehension (Accounts) with Speaker and Comprehender Characteristics: Toward Socially Situated Interpretation.利用说话者和理解者特征扩展情境语言理解(描述):迈向社会情境解释。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 24;8:2267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02267. eCollection 2017.