Dudgeon Deborah J, Knott Christine, Eichholz Mary, Gerlach Jacqueline Lochhaas, Chapman Cheryl, Viola Raymond, Van Dijk Janice, Preston Sharon, Batchelor Diane, Bartfay Emma
Queen's Palliative Care Program, Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington Palliative Care Integration Project Evaluation Committee, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Jun;35(6):573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.013. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines for cancer patients as a strategy to improve the quality, coordination, and integration of palliative care service across organizations and health care sectors. A pre-post design to measure the impact on symptom management, caregiver burden and satisfaction with care delivery, and service utilization was used. Two cohorts of eligible patients and caregivers completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scales, Caregiver Reaction Assessment and FAMCARE Scales and chart audits were conducted. Administrative data from each participating site were examined for utilization trends. Audits of 53 charts preimplementation and 63 postimplementation showed an increase in documentation of pain from 24.5% to 74.6% (P<0.001) of charts. Administrative data showed a decrease in the percentage of patients with at least one emergency room visit from 94.3% to 84.8% (P<0.001), in the percentage of patients with at least one admission to the acute care hospital (P<0.001), and deaths in acute care 43.1%-35.7% (P=0.133). There was minimal change in the intensity of symptoms (P=0.591), and no change in the burden on the caregiver (P=0.086) or caregiver satisfaction with care (P=0.942). This study showed that implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines across health sectors can result in some increased documentation of symptoms and efficiencies in care. Future projects should consider imbedding a continuous quality improvement methodology and longer timelines into their projects to improve outcomes.
本研究评估了实施针对癌症患者的通用评估工具、协作式护理计划和症状管理指南的有效性,以此作为一种策略来提高各组织和医疗保健部门间姑息治疗服务的质量、协调性和整合性。采用前后对照设计来衡量对症状管理、照护者负担、对护理服务的满意度以及服务利用情况的影响。两组符合条件的患者和照护者完成了埃德蒙顿症状评估量表、照护者反应评估量表和家庭照护量表,并进行了病历审核。对每个参与站点的行政数据进行了分析,以了解利用趋势。实施前对53份病历进行审核,实施后对63份病历进行审核,结果显示疼痛记录从病历的24.5%增加到74.6%(P<0.001)。行政数据显示,至少有一次急诊就诊的患者比例从94.3%降至84.8%(P<0.001),至少有一次入住急性护理医院的患者比例下降(P<0.001),急性护理中的死亡人数从43.1%降至35.7%(P=0.133)。症状强度变化极小(P=0.591),照护者负担无变化(P=0.086),照护者对护理的满意度也无变化(P=0.942)。本研究表明,跨卫生部门实施通用评估工具、协作式护理计划和症状管理指南可使症状记录有所增加,并提高护理效率。未来的项目应考虑将持续质量改进方法和更长的时间线纳入项目中,以改善结果。