• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义记忆损伤的计算模型:模态特异性与新兴类别特异性

A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity.

作者信息

Farah M J, McClelland J L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Dec;120(4):339-57.

PMID:1837294
Abstract

It is demonstrated how a modality-specific semantic memory system can account for category-specific impairments after brain damage. In Experiment 1, the hypothesis that visual and functional knowledge play different roles in the representation of living things and nonliving things is tested and confirmed. A parallel distributed processing model of semantic memory in which knowledge is subdivided by modality into visual and functional components is described. In Experiment 2, the model is lesioned, and it is confirmed that damage to visual semantics primarily impairs knowledge of living things, and damage to functional semantics primarily impairs knowledge of nonliving things. In Experiment 3, it is demonstrated that the model accounts naturally for a finding that had appeared problematic for a modality-specific architecture, namely, impaired retrieval of functional knowledge about living things. Finally, in Experiment 4, it is shown how the model can account for a recent observation of impaired knowledge of living things only when knowledge is probed verbally.

摘要

本文展示了特定模态语义记忆系统如何解释脑损伤后的类别特异性损伤。在实验1中,视觉和功能知识在生物和非生物表征中发挥不同作用的假设得到了检验和证实。文中描述了一种语义记忆的并行分布式处理模型,其中知识按模态细分为视觉和功能成分。在实验2中,该模型受到损伤,结果证实视觉语义损伤主要损害生物知识,功能语义损伤主要损害非生物知识。在实验3中,证明了该模型能自然地解释一个对特定模态架构来说曾有问题的发现,即关于生物的功能知识检索受损。最后,在实验4中,展示了该模型如何解释最近一项观察结果,即只有当通过言语探测知识时,才会出现生物知识受损的情况。

相似文献

1
A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity.语义记忆损伤的计算模型:模态特异性与新兴类别特异性
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Dec;120(4):339-57.
2
The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia.语义距离在生物类别特异性损伤中的作用:来自一例语义性痴呆的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1017-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.006. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
3
Neuroanatomical basis in the temporal lobes for processing living things.颞叶中处理生物的神经解剖学基础。
Neuropsychology. 2004 Oct;18(4):700-9. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.4.700.
4
Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits.物体识别中的层次结构、相似性和交互性:“类别特异性”神经心理学缺陷。
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509.
5
Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits.概念结构与概念的结构:对类别特异性缺陷的分布式解释。
Brain Lang. 2000 Nov;75(2):195-231. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2353.
6
Genetic and environmental influences on the organisation of semantic memory in the brain:is "living things" an innate category?遗传和环境对大脑语义记忆组织的影响:“生物”是一种先天类别吗?
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):401-8. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000293.
7
Semantic processing of living and nonliving concepts across the cerebral hemispheres.大脑两半球对生物和非生物概念的语义加工
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 28.
8
Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.语义记忆的结构与衰退:一项神经心理学与计算研究。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):205-35. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205.
9
Evaluating feature-category relations using semantic fluency tasks.使用语义流畅性任务评估特征-类别关系。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Jul;58(2):202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.11.004.
10
Cognitive neuroscience studies of semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病语义记忆的认知神经科学研究
Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:393-407. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00025-8.

引用本文的文献

1
From semantic knowledge to semantic features: French semantic feature production norms for 360 concepts.从语义知识到语义特征:360个概念的法语语义特征生成规范
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 10;57(10):282. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02814-z.
2
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.我们所说的语义是什么意思:迈向一个多学科语义词汇表。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Breakdown of category-specific word representations in a brain-constrained neurocomputational model of semantic dementia.
大脑受限的语义痴呆神经计算模型中特定类别词汇表示的分解。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 10;13(1):19572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41922-8.
4
The cross-linguistic comparison of perceptual strength norms for Korean, English and L2 English.韩语、英语和二语英语感知强度规范的跨语言比较。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1188909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188909. eCollection 2023.
5
Neurobiological mechanisms for language, symbols and concepts: Clues from brain-constrained deep neural networks.神经生物学机制语言、符号和概念:来自受大脑约束的深度神经网络的线索。
Prog Neurobiol. 2023 Nov;230:102511. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102511. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
6
Concrete and Abstract Concepts in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Alzheimer's Disease: A Scoping Review.原发性进行性失语症和阿尔茨海默病中的具体概念和抽象概念:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2023 May 5;13(5):765. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050765.
7
Bigram semantic distance as an index of continuous semantic flow in natural language: Theory, tools, and applications.双词语义距离作为自然语言中连续语义流的指标:理论、工具和应用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2578-2590. doi: 10.1037/xge0001389. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
8
Domain-specific connectivity drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain.领域特定连接驱动大脑中物体知识的组织。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;187:221-244. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823493-8.00028-6.
9
Evidence for a deep, distributed and dynamic code for animacy in human ventral anterior temporal cortex.人类腹侧前颞叶皮层中存在生动性的深层、分布式和动态代码的证据。
Elife. 2021 Oct 27;10:e66276. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66276.
10
Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.270个法语单词的感知和内感受强度规范
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:667271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667271. eCollection 2021.