Dougherty Donald M, Marsh-Richard Dawn M, Hatzis Erin S, Nouvion Sylvain O, Mathias Charles W
Neurobehavioral Research Laboratory and Clinic, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
Acute alcohol administration affects impulsive behavior, although these effects vary as a function of alcohol dose, assessment instrument, and time of measurement following administration.
We concurrently examined the dose-dependent effects of alcohol on three distinct types of impulsivity tasks (continuous performance [IMT], stop-signal [GoStop], and delay-discounting [SKIP] tasks). Ninety healthy alcohol drinkers were assigned to one of the three task groups (n=30 each), each group experienced placebo, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 g/kg alcohol doses across 5 experimental days, and task performance was assessed at 0.5h before and 0.25, 1.0, and 2.0 h after alcohol administration. We hypothesized that impulsive responding on all tasks would be increased by acute alcohol administration both across time and during the peak BrAC, but the magnitude would depend on the task being tested. Analyses included the time course and the peak BrAC effects. Task comparisons of peak behavioral changes following each dose are illustrated using standardized scores.
While alcohol consumption increased impulsive responding during all three tasks to some extent, our hypothesis was only partially supported. During the IMT, the 0.6 and 0.8 g/kg doses produced increased impulsive responding across time and at the peak BrAC. However, during the GoStop and SKIP, impulsivity increased across time regardless of the alcohol dose size, with no differences in impulsive responding among dose conditions at peak BrAC.
This study demonstrated alcohol-induced changes in impulsivity are not uniformly affected by alcohol. These data, in conjunction with previous studies, further support that impulsivity is not a unitary construct.
急性饮酒会影响冲动行为,尽管这些影响会因酒精剂量、评估工具以及饮酒后测量时间的不同而有所变化。
我们同时考察了酒精对三种不同类型冲动性任务(连续操作[IMT]、停止信号[GoStop]和延迟折扣[SKIP]任务)的剂量依赖性影响。90名健康饮酒者被分配到三个任务组之一(每组n = 30),每组在5个实验日内分别接受安慰剂、0.2、0.4、0.6和0.8 g/kg的酒精剂量,并在饮酒前0.5小时以及饮酒后0.25、1.0和2.0小时评估任务表现。我们假设,急性饮酒会在整个时间段以及呼气酒精浓度(BrAC)峰值期间增加所有任务中的冲动反应,但增加的幅度将取决于所测试的任务。分析包括时间进程和BrAC峰值效应。使用标准化分数展示各剂量后峰值行为变化的任务比较情况。
虽然饮酒在一定程度上增加了所有三项任务中的冲动反应,但我们的假设仅得到部分支持。在IMT任务中,0.6和0.8 g/kg的剂量在整个时间段以及BrAC峰值时产生了增加的冲动反应。然而,在GoStop和SKIP任务中,无论酒精剂量大小,冲动性都随时间增加,在BrAC峰值时各剂量条件下的冲动反应没有差异。
本研究表明,酒精引起的冲动性变化并非均一受酒精影响。这些数据与先前的研究一起,进一步支持冲动性不是一个单一的概念。