Suppr超能文献

克里斯汀·博内维、蒂内·塔姆斯和伊丽莎白·席曼在早期遗传学领域:女性开启大学职业生涯的新机遇。

Kristine Bonnevie, Tine Tammes and Elisabeth Schiemann in early genetics: emerging chances for a university career for women.

作者信息

Stamhuis Ida H, Monsen Arve

机构信息

Department for the History and Social Studies of Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Hist Biol. 2007 Fall;40(3):427-66. doi: 10.1007/s10739-007-9132-x.

Abstract

The beginning of the twentieth century saw the emergence of the discipline of genetics. It is striking how many female scientists were contributing to this new field at the time. At least three female pioneers succeeded in becoming professors: Kristine Bonnevie (Norway), Elisabeth Schiemann (Germany) and the Tine Tammes (The Netherlands). The question is which factors contributed to the success of these women's careers? At the time women were gaining access to university education it had become quite the norm for universities to be sites for teaching and research. They were still expanding: new laboratories were being built and new disciplines were being established. All three women benefited from the fact that genetics was considered a new field promising in terms of its utility to society; in the case of Tammes and Schiemann in agriculture and in the case of Bonnevie in eugenics. On the other hand, the field of genetics also benefited from the fact that these first female researchers were eager for the chance to work in science and wanted to make active contributions. The all worked and studied in environments which, although different from one another, were positive towards them, at least at the start. Having a patron was generally a prerequisite. Tammes profited from her teacher's contacts and status. Bonnevie made herself indispensable through her success as a teacher and eventually made her position so strong that she was no longer dependent on a single patron. The case of Schiemann adds something new; it shows the vulnerability of such dependency. Initially, Schiemann's teacher had to rely on the first generation of university women simply because he was unable to attract ambitious young men to his institute. In those early, uncertain years of the new discipline, male scientists tended to choose other, better established, and more prestigious disciplines. However, when genetics itself had become an established field, it also became more attractive to men. Our case studies also demonstrate that a new field at first relatively open to women closes its doors to them once it becomes established.

摘要

二十世纪初,遗传学学科应运而生。令人惊讶的是,当时有许多女性科学家投身于这一崭新领域。至少有三位女性先驱成功成为教授:克里斯汀·博内维(挪威)、伊丽莎白·席曼(德国)和蒂内·塔姆斯(荷兰)。问题在于,哪些因素促成了这些女性职业生涯的成功呢?在女性开始接受大学教育之时,大学成为教学与研究场所已相当普遍。大学仍在不断扩张:新实验室在兴建,新学科在设立。这三位女性都受益于遗传学被视为一个对社会具有实用价值的新领域这一事实;就塔姆斯和席曼而言,是在农业领域,而博内维则是在优生学领域。另一方面,遗传学领域也得益于这些首批女性研究人员渴望在科学领域工作并积极做出贡献这一事实。她们都在虽彼此不同但至少在一开始对她们持积极态度的环境中工作和学习。拥有赞助人通常是一个先决条件。塔姆斯得益于她老师的人脉和地位。博内维凭借其作为教师的成功使自己不可或缺,最终使自己的地位稳固到不再依赖单一赞助人。席曼的例子增添了新内容;它显示了这种依赖的脆弱性。起初,席曼的老师不得不依赖第一代大学女性,仅仅是因为他无法吸引有抱负的年轻男性到他的研究所。在新学科早期那些不确定的岁月里,男性科学家往往选择其他更成熟、更有声望的学科。然而,当遗传学自身成为一个成熟领域后,它对男性也变得更具吸引力了。我们的案例研究还表明,一个起初相对对女性开放的新领域,一旦确立,就会对她们关上大门。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验