• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就新出现的健康威胁与公众进行沟通:事前信息开发项目的经验教训。

Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project.

作者信息

Wray Ricardo J, Becker Steven M, Henderson Neil, Glik Deborah, Jupka Keri, Middleton Sarah, Henderson Carson, Drury Allison, Mitchell Elizabeth W

机构信息

Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec;98(12):2214-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107102. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2006.107102
PMID:18382011
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2636543/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to better understand the challenges of communicating with the public about emerging health threats, particularly threats involving toxic chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive materials.

METHODS

At the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium of investigative teams from 4 schools of public health. Over 2 years, the investigative teams conducted 79 focus group interviews with 884 participants and individual cognitive response interviews with 129 respondents, for a total sample of 1013 individuals. The investigative teams systematically compared their results with other published research in public health, risk communication, and emergency preparedness.

RESULTS

We found limited public understanding of emerging biological, chemical, and radioactive materials threats and of the differences between them; demand for concrete, accurate, and consistent information about actions needed for protection of self and family; active information seeking from media, local authorities, and selected national sources; and areas in which current emergency messaging can be improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The public will respond to a threat situation by seeking protective information and taking self-protective action, underlining the critical role of effective communication in public health emergencies.

摘要

目标

我们试图更好地理解在向公众传达新出现的健康威胁,特别是涉及有毒化学物质、生物制剂和放射性物质的威胁方面所面临的挑战。

方法

应疾病控制与预防中心的要求,我们组建了一个由4所公共卫生学院的调查团队组成的跨学科联盟。在两年多的时间里,调查团队对884名参与者进行了79次焦点小组访谈,并对129名受访者进行了个人认知反应访谈,样本总数为1013人。调查团队系统地将他们的结果与公共卫生、风险沟通和应急准备方面的其他已发表研究进行了比较。

结果

我们发现公众对新出现的生物、化学和放射性物质威胁以及它们之间的差异了解有限;对关于保护自己和家人所需行动的具体、准确和一致信息有需求;积极从媒体、地方当局和选定的国家来源寻求信息;以及当前应急信息可以改进的领域。

结论

公众会通过寻求防护信息和采取自我保护行动来应对威胁情况,这凸显了有效沟通在公共卫生紧急事件中的关键作用。

相似文献

1
Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project.就新出现的健康威胁与公众进行沟通:事前信息开发项目的经验教训。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec;98(12):2214-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107102. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
2
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
3
Effective media communication of disasters: pressing problems and recommendations.灾害的有效媒体沟通:紧迫问题与建议
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 6;7:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-97.
4
Assessing radiation emergency preparedness planning by using community assessment for public health emergency response (CASPER) methodology.使用社区公共卫生应急响应评估(CASPER)方法评估辐射应急准备规划。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Jun;29(3):262-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14000491. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
5
A Conceptual Model for Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication in Public Health.用于评估公共卫生应急风险沟通的概念模型。
Health Secur. 2018 May/Jun;16(3):193-203. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0020.
6
Preparedness for allied health professionals: risk communication training in a rural state.联合健康专业人员的准备工作:农村州的风险沟通培训
J Allied Health. 2007 Summer;36(2):72-6.
7
Communicating Recommendations in Public Health Emergencies: The Role of Public Health Authorities.突发公共卫生事件中的建议传播:公共卫生当局的作用。
Health Secur. 2020 Jan/Feb;18(1):21-28. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0073.
8
NCRP 53RD Annual Meeting, Assessment of National Efforts in Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Terrorism: Communication, Education, and Public Information Session Q&A.美国国家辐射防护与测量委员会第53届年会,核恐怖主义应急准备国家工作评估:沟通、教育与公众信息环节问答
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):218-224. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000779.
9
Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses.提高医院应对放射性恐怖主义的准备能力:急诊科医生和护士的观点
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Oct;2(3):174-84. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31817dcd9a.
10
Terrorism: a public health threat with a trauma system response.恐怖主义:一种需创伤系统应对的公共卫生威胁。
J Trauma. 2003 Dec;55(6):1014-21. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000084515.74480.BA.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Brigada Digital de Salud Audience Reach and Engagement: A Digital Community Health Worker Model to Address COVID-19 Misinformation in Spanish on Social Media.评估“健康数字旅”的受众覆盖面与参与度:一种通过数字社区卫生工作者模式应对社交媒体上西班牙语版新冠疫情错误信息的方法。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;11(8):1346. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081346.
2
Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis.卫生系统中灾害风险沟通的过程与组成部分:一项主题分析
Jamba. 2022 Dec 8;14(1):1367. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1367. eCollection 2022.
3
Making It Work: The Experiences of Delivering a Community Mental Health Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic.《化危为机:在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供社区心理健康服务的经验》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;19(19):12056. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912056.
4
Public Health Messaging during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Family Caregivers' COVID-19 Knowledge.新冠疫情期间的公共卫生信息传递及其对家庭护理人员新冠知识的影响。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Aug;18(1):75-89. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26903.
5
Resilience and stress in frontline social workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.新加坡新冠疫情期间一线社会工作者的适应力与压力
Asian Soc Work Policy Rev. 2021 Oct;15(3):234-243. doi: 10.1111/aswp.12237. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
Lessons Learned From , a Social Media-Based Science Communication Project Targeting the COVID-19 Infodemic.从基于社交媒体的科学传播项目(针对 COVID-19 信息疫情)中吸取的教训。
Public Health Rep. 2022 May-Jun;137(3):449-456. doi: 10.1177/00333549221076544. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Testing the public's response to receiving severe flood warnings using simulated cell broadcast.使用模拟小区广播测试公众对收到严重洪水预警的反应。
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;112(2):1611-1631. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05241-x. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
The Relationships Between Socioeconomic Status, COVID-19 Risk Perceptions, and the Adoption of Protective Measures in a Mid-Western City in the United States.美国中西部城市中社会经济地位、COVID-19 风险认知与采取防护措施之间的关系。
J Community Health. 2022 Jun;47(3):464-474. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01070-y. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
9
Socioeconomic status, damage-related conditions, and PTSD following the Fukushima-daiichi nuclear power plant accident:The Fukushima Health Management Survey.福岛第一核电站事故后的社会经济地位、与损害相关的情况和创伤后应激障碍:福岛健康管理调查。
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2021;67(2):71-82. doi: 10.5387/fms.2020-24.
10
Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.在新加坡 COVID-19 大流行期间管理中,对一家急性医院的危机和应急风险沟通的感知调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;20(1):1919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10047-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparing for bioterrorism at the state level: report of an informal survey.州级生物恐怖主义防范准备:一项非正式调查的报告
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2002 Oct;72(4):486-91. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.72.4.486.
2
Chemical (VX) terrorist threat: public knowledge, attitudes, and responses.化学(VX)恐怖主义威胁:公众认知、态度及应对措施
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):224-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.224.
3
Public perceptions and risk communications for botulism.肉毒中毒的公众认知与风险沟通
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):216-23. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.216.
4
What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague?如果发生利用鼠疫进行的恐怖袭击,公众想知道什么?
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):208-15. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.208.
5
Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials.涉及放射性物质的恐怖事件中的应急通信与信息问题。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):195-207. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.195.
6
Breaking new ground in WMD risk communication: the pre-event message development project.大规模杀伤性武器风险沟通领域的新突破:事件前信息开发项目。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):193-4. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.193.
7
Will public health's response to terrorism be fair? Racial/ethnic variations in perceived fairness during a bioterrorist event.公共卫生对恐怖主义的应对会公平吗?生物恐怖事件期间感知公平方面的种族/族裔差异。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):146-56. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.146.
8
Minimizing casualties in biological and chemical threats (war and terrorism): the importance of information to the public in a prevention program.将生物和化学威胁(战争与恐怖主义)中的伤亡降至最低:预防计划中向公众提供信息的重要性。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004 Jan-Mar;19(1):29-36. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000145x.
9
Person and place: the compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health.个人与地点:种族/族裔和农村地区对健康的复合影响。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Oct;94(10):1695-703. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.10.1695.
10
Emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism: planning a public health response.生物恐怖主义的情绪和行为后果:规划公共卫生应对措施。
Milbank Q. 2004;82(3):413-55, table of contents. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00317.x.