Rockward Willie S, Thomas Anthony L, Zhao Bing, Dimarzio Charles A
Department of Physics, Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia 30314, USA.
Appl Opt. 2008 Apr 1;47(10):1684-96. doi: 10.1364/ao.47.001684.
Imaging of phase or optical path length is becoming more important with the development of better imaging systems, computational algorithms, faster computers, and a greater interest in the imaging of transparent objects. Early phase imaging involved qualitative imaging of phase gradients. New computational algorithms can be used to extract some quantitative phase imaging from these techniques. In contrast, new hardware has enabled full-field quantitative phase imaging on a practical and cost-effective scale. We explore a quantitative comparison between two techniques for imaging phase. In the first technique, phase is recovered from a pair of differential interference contrast images, and in the second technique, phase is measured pixel-by-pixel interferometrically. It is shown, experimentally, that the overall results are similar, but each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.
随着更好的成像系统、计算算法、更快的计算机的发展以及对透明物体成像的更大兴趣,相位或光程长度成像变得越来越重要。早期的相位成像涉及相位梯度的定性成像。新的计算算法可用于从这些技术中提取一些定量相位成像。相比之下,新硬件已在实际且经济高效的规模上实现了全场定量相位成像。我们探索了两种相位成像技术之间的定量比较。在第一种技术中,从一对微分干涉对比图像中恢复相位,在第二种技术中,逐像素干涉测量相位。实验表明,总体结果相似,但每种技术都有其自身的优缺点。