• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格主导与空间垂直维度的偏好使用:来自空间注意范式的证据。

Personality dominance and preferential use of the vertical dimension of space: evidence from spatial attention paradigms.

作者信息

Moeller Sara K, Robinson Michael D, Zabelina Darya L

机构信息

Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):355-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02093.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02093.x
PMID:18399888
Abstract

Previous research has shown that dominant individuals frequently think in terms of dominance hierarchies, which typically invoke vertical metaphor (e.g., "upper" vs. "lower" class). Accordingly, we predicted that in spatial attention paradigms, such individuals would systematically favor the vertical dimension of space more than individuals low in dominance. This prediction was supported by two studies (total N= 96), which provided three tests involving two different spatial attention paradigms. In all cases, analyses controlling for speed of response to horizontal spatial probes revealed that more dominant individuals were faster than less dominant individuals to respond to probes along the vertical dimension of space. Such data support the metaphor-representation perspective, according to which people think in metaphoric terms, even in on-line processing tasks. These results have implications for understanding dominance and also indicate that conceptual metaphor is relevant to understanding the cognitive-processing basis of personality.

摘要

先前的研究表明,占主导地位的个体经常从等级制度的角度思考,这通常会引发垂直隐喻(例如,“上层”与“下层”阶级)。因此,我们预测,在空间注意力范式中,与低主导性个体相比,这类个体在空间维度上会更系统地偏好垂直维度。两项研究(总样本量N = 96)支持了这一预测,这两项研究提供了涉及两种不同空间注意力范式的三项测试。在所有情况下,对水平空间探测的反应速度进行控制的分析表明,在对沿空间垂直维度的探测做出反应时,主导性较强的个体比主导性较弱的个体速度更快。这些数据支持了隐喻表征观点,即人们即使在在线处理任务中也会用隐喻的方式思考。这些结果对于理解主导性具有启示意义,同时也表明概念隐喻与理解人格的认知加工基础相关。

相似文献

1
Personality dominance and preferential use of the vertical dimension of space: evidence from spatial attention paradigms.人格主导与空间垂直维度的偏好使用:来自空间注意范式的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):355-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02093.x.
2
Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance.为什么主导型人格在面对面的群体中能获得影响力?特质主导的能力信号效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):491-503. doi: 10.1037/a0014201.
3
Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.近侧和远侧空间中的水平和垂直假性忽视。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Aug;73(3):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.006.
4
Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space.隐喻一致效应中的极性对应:结构重叠预测了在垂直空间中呈现的两极概念的分类时间。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):726-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024955. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
5
What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine.上帝的“上方”是什么?垂直空间作为神性的一种表征。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):699-710. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.699.
6
Neural correlates of covert orienting of visual spatial attention along vertical and horizontal dimensions.视觉空间注意沿垂直和水平维度的隐蔽定向的神经关联。
Brain Res. 2007 Mar 9;1136(1):142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.031. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
7
How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D.语言和文化力量如何塑造时间观念:英语和汉语时间的 3D 视角
Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(7):1305-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.x.
8
The relationship between dominance rank and spatial ability among male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).雄性草甸田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus)的优势等级与空间能力之间的关系。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Sep;118(3):332-9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.3.332.
9
Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.听觉注意的右半球优势及其受眼位的调节:一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):211-25.
10
Hot-headed is more than an expression: the embodied representation of anger in terms of heat.头脑发热不仅仅是一种表达:愤怒在热度方面的具身化表现。
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):464-77. doi: 10.1037/a0015764.

引用本文的文献

1
A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition.道德分裂的家庭:理想化的家庭模式如何影响政治认知。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193347. eCollection 2018.
2
Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.心理学中的可重复性检验:一种结合了具有统计学意义的原始研究和复制研究的混合方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1515-1539. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0967-6.
3
Action Contribution to Competence Judgments: The Use of the Journey Schema.
行动对能力判断的贡献:旅程图式的运用
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00448. eCollection 2016.
4
Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search.情感视觉搜索中情感的垂直与水平表征对比。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):62-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6.
5
Perceptual simulation in gender categorization: associations between gender, vertical height, and spatial size.性别分类中的知觉模拟:性别、垂直高度和空间大小之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089768. eCollection 2014.
6
Vertical metaphor with motion and judgment: a valenced congruency effect with fluency.具有运动和判断的垂直隐喻:一种与流畅性相关的效价一致性效应。
Psychol Res. 2014 Sep;78(5):736-48. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0516-6.
7
Do you use your head or follow your heart? Self-location predicts personality, emotion, decision making, and performance.你是用脑还是用心?自我定位预测个性、情绪、决策和表现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):316-34. doi: 10.1037/a0033374. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
8
Metaphors are Embodied, and so are Their Literal Counterparts.隐喻是具身的,其字面对应词也是如此。
Front Psychol. 2011 May 10;2:90. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00090. eCollection 2011.