Zuba Dariusz
Institute of Forensic Research, Westerplatte 9, 31033 Krakow, Poland.
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Jul 4;178(2-3):e29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
Usefulness of portable, handheld breath analysers equipped with electrochemical sensor was assessed. Breath- and blood-alcohol concentrations in drunken drivers were taken from 370 expert opinions elaborated at the Institute of Forensic Research between January 1st 2002 and February 28th 2007. The results of second and subsequent measurements were re-calculated using mean elimination rates. The readings of portable instruments were in very good agreement with the results of confirmatory analyses performed by stationary devices (r=0.978, p<0.001, y=0.969x-0.0002). The correlation with the results of blood analysis was weaker (r=0.940, p<0.001, y=1.722x+0.214), but comparable with the correlation between the readings of stationary devices and the results of blood analyses (r=0.936, p<0.001, y=1.790x+0.091). The readings of portable and stationary breath analysers were also compared by the Bland-Altman plots. The differences in results were independent of alcohol concentration (absolute difference (mg/L): r=0.054, p>0.1, y=0.011x+0.013; relative difference (%): r=0.020, p>0.1, y=0.90x+2.36).
对配备电化学传感器的便携式手持式呼气分析仪的实用性进行了评估。醉酒司机的呼气和血液酒精浓度取自2002年1月1日至2007年2月28日在法医研究所精心编制的370份专家意见。第二次及后续测量结果使用平均消除率重新计算。便携式仪器的读数与固定设备进行的验证分析结果非常吻合(r = 0.978,p < 0.001,y = 0.969x - 0.0002)。与血液分析结果的相关性较弱(r = 0.940,p < 0.001,y = 1.722x + 0.214),但与固定设备读数和血液分析结果之间的相关性相当(r = 0.936,p < 0.001,y = 1.790x + 0.091)。还通过Bland-Altman图比较了便携式和固定式呼气分析仪的读数。结果差异与酒精浓度无关(绝对差异(mg/L):r = 0.054,p > 0.1,y = 0.011x + 0.013;相对差异(%):r = 0.020,p > 0.1,y = 0.90x + 2.36)。